Its absolutely a possibility. She was scum. Presume everything she did in her death throes was intended to throw people off her team mates and onto an innocent.
Mafia 66: Farmers versus the Railroad - the play
- Thread starter johnlarson66
- Start date
Its absolutely a possibility. She was scum. Presume everything she did in her death throes was intended to throw people off her team mates and onto an innocent.
A question before I head out...
Anyone have any reason not to be voting either Coler or Lab at this point?
I feel myself pulled in both directions but I want to know why some people consider both to be innocent. I'm mainly curious.
Anyone have any reason not to be voting either Coler or Lab at this point?
I feel myself pulled in both directions but I want to know why some people consider both to be innocent. I'm mainly curious.
You don't need me to say that this is a good question.
I have Lab Rat high up as a candidate primarily for the not voting for Noods strategy yesterday. As per my review though, on my view of the game, if it is any way accurate, she was innocent on D1 and I would have a problem with any theory that says she was scummy on D1.
I do tend to like Dag as well however and if I have more time that's whose posts I propose looking at next.
I have Lab Rat high up as a candidate primarily for the not voting for Noods strategy yesterday. As per my review though, on my view of the game, if it is any way accurate, she was innocent on D1 and I would have a problem with any theory that says she was scummy on D1.
I do tend to like Dag as well however and if I have more time that's whose posts I propose looking at next.
why did you do an OMGUS vote on kashta after she accused noods if it wasn't to try and protect noods?
Wow Coler, talk about slipping up, cracking, whatever you want to call it. I know you corrected it but that's one heck of a mistake there.
I know you were on my suspect list from the beginning because I saw you defending scum by going after Kash. How can you deny you were the one to start the whole "let's lynch Kash" fiasco on day 1? Just because you pulled your vote off of her, only to replace it on her, does not clear you. And how do you explain Noods last minute jump to save you and get Kash lynched?
If you'd been lynched and showed innocent, who knows if anyone besides me would have believed Kash when she claimed Noods was scum. Without it being confirmed she was IW, probably no one, and Noods was likely safe. I was the ONLY person to put a vote on Noods day 1. Noods jumping to save you at the last minute makes me think you're scum. Actually, if you were truly innocent, Noods would have been smart to jump and put a vote on you and get you lynched. People would have seriously doubted Kash's claim of Noods being scum, she likely would have been in the clear. So explain that, if you are innocent, why would Noods not have voted you out first round instead of Kash. And none of the "this has been a sophisticated frame job orchestrated since the very first few posts" excuses...though creative, they're just false.
Read my thought above, and answer this question: If Coler is innocent, why wouldn't Noods have voted to lynch Coler in an effort to discredit Kash?
1) It wasn't an OMGUS - that's when you vote for someone who picks you out for no other reason than that they picked you out.
2) Think it through townies. Noods didn't need my protection at that stage - what, 1 vote on her really early on D1. Yes the drama caught up around it and finished off kashta, but there was no need for a scum vote to protect noods, when I posted. I was ultimately not convinced by kashta's posting after this, having lifted my vote and then put it back on.
Short version, I thought kashta was scum on D1. Now, if there were other townies who did the same thing, you'll all of you understand how that could have happened. If there were not, well, so be it scumbags.
My vote on kashta, made directly after her vote on noods, was not to protect noods. My subsequent re-vote on kashta was arising out of her subsequent posts.
When you guys get right down it, all there is about me at all is my vote for kashta, which was a D1 vote. After that, there is just the behaviour of a known scum (noodles) which incriminates me. I don't think I can put it any better than that. Think it through townies.
I'm just stopping in quick before going back to sleep before going back to work, but I wanted to touch on this question.
I'm not 100% convinced Coler is innocent Jpap. I'm just saying that everything others are using as evidence is not enough to sway my vote that way. 'Specially at this delicate juncture in the game. As for Labby, it seems to me she's been as solid as can be this game, and she's been right in her assessments thus far from what I can remember atm, and her story/posting/persona in this game has not faltered. I'm 70% sure they are both innocent and the scum jumped on them going at each other early on. I think this is one of the distractions you congratulated the RRers for earlier Jpap.
I'm 100% sure at least one is innocent, though I really feel both of them are. I think it's too risky to put them both up for lynch given the (seemingly) consensus belief that if we screw up tonight we're done. If these were the only two on the block, I have no idea which way I'd land... probably Coler.
I hope this made sense, my eyes are still mostly closed and I haven't had any caffeine or nicotine yet...
The bit in bold - if the town thinks that's a fatal slip up on my part - to heck with it there's nothing I can do. I corrected it immediately, without editing, it doesn't actually make any sense the way I wrote it first.
Coler only because noods may have framed him, i dont really think thats what happened though, im gettin way to much "hes a scumbag" vibes from him/
