I vote to lynch Lab_Rat.
Being the third vote on FF just seems to easy of a place to hide. Plus she is trying to make sense out of what FF posts. Also FF did not get OMGUSy on Lab, FF voted on Lab before Lab voted. Dag voted for FF and so did DD, but FF did not get all freaked out.
Who knows what FF is? Can anyone really tell by how he is playing? Is a team really going to investigate him or hit him? FF is once again the center of attention. Trying to make sense out of FF or building a case against FF is a joke.
Hmmmm....being the 3rd vote has had a history of being the scummy one, however I find it alarming you have mentioned it, especially so early in the game.
I don't see any easy places to hide on the FF train. If he is innocent, he has made statements that are certainly contradictory to his actual role. If he is scumbag, I will trust noone that voted for him either, as his posts are almost all so slime covered that even the communicating scumbags must realize they will have to vote for him or risk exposing themselves. Some of them may have already

jpap, I think FF played very well last game and played very differently than he is playing now. In that game he was on the communicating evil team. I do not think FF is on a communicating team. I also don't think a communicating team will investigate him.
I think he is playing like the FF of old, now does that mean he is non-communicating mafia? Hard to say, he is playing just like he has when he has been non-communicating mafia and innocent.
Very non committal, but overall you are implying FF is not a good lynch candidate because he always posts scummy things, even when he was innocent. Is this a fair assessment of this post?
"sure seems tempting" went to a vote in the same post. I would expect FF to play a little more conservative if he had a scum role. You really think his posts make him look nervous?
Turning up the heat a little here. You state you would expect FF to play conservatively if he had a scum role? Is this your basis for your seemingly increasing defence of FF? Because he isn't playing conservatively?
Lab, do you think FF is playing the same way he did last game?
So far, you have tried to talk Jpap and Lab out of voting for FF. Correct me if this is a misrepresentation of your posts.
Last game I really never saw FF getting lots of attention, Kash vs noods took over most of the attention.
He got some attention. At first I paid no attention to the crazy things he was posting. In the end we (Coler, Wiz and I) decided Dag was the best candidate for the lynch, based on the fact that we believed Dags early attack on FF was a scumbag looking for an easy target, which FF often makes of himself. In the end, I believed FF was just a crazy townie that had made some scummy posts and Dag was an opportunistic scumbag trying to exploit him.
He has my full attention now, and so does anyone trying to rationalize not voting for him at this point.
..., just vote for me.
Care to name a suspect list?
What do you think of JB's and JL's posts so far in relation to you? I think they are both scumbags, but that of course dependent upon you being a scumbag.
My vote isnt set in stone FF. If you find a better suspect, and build a case, I could be swayed. But the fact is its D1, there is an abscence of good information and you are the best (and only) option on the table I can see. If you are innocent, you better find me a better option. Good luck with that.
That being said I'm tempted to move my vote to one of the non existent players, like Noods or Rich for example. Maybe they only post when they see their names in bold? Seems a little unfair not to consider them for a lynchin' just because they haven't said diddly as of yet dontcha think?
FF maybe you should kick one of their doors in. They seem pretty scummy for having said nothing at all.