Mafia #74...ACville Penitentiary!

[jbradt]

Is Vix your Mimi?

:headshake2: Labby is.. but she's no longer with us. :nilly:

 

[jbradt]

did you have to settle her down so both of your heads don't explode?

my last post was to JB not DD

LOL... Vix doesn't seem like the type that could be settled down by any external force.

 

[Lady G]

I did break a rule, and I'm sorry. HOWEVER, that was THE EXACT post that I had posted, I only changed one color.



You have got to be kidding me JM, I hope that a mod can come and un edit the post so that we can see what happened. I'm going to send a PM to LG and ask her if thats possible. I don't see why you insist upon lying about this, and refuse to be an active participant in this game.....

I have no idea what is possible for site mods to do/not to do. The rule states NO EDITING, please follow the rules and there will be no questions as to what Mods can/can not do. There is a reason for the rule and it needs to be enforced. Sorry I am not trying to be mean to you, but you can not edit posts. Please do not do it, I would hate to have to take someone out of the game for such a little thing.
This is to everyone...DO NOT EDIT YOUR POSTS, even for color, spelling correction, wording, do not edit means just that.
Thank you!

a86;2407265]opcorn: opcorn: opcorn:

[Eating it to keep my zombie mouth shut:angryfire:]

PLEASE DO NOT POST AFTER DEATH!!

 

[FishVixen]

Sorry folks I've come down with a fever and vomiting so been resting. well be back in morning. Good night all.

 

[jpappy789]

I'd say my top suspects at this point are UN, 2H, DD, and Jm. I think I've pretty much explained why for each at some point recently.

 

[IceH2O]

Definitely not looking great for UN or Jm right now...but I'd have to place User ahead concerning the whole voting Pir then not wanting to vote Pir thing. In the end his vote helped kill an innocent and he had every chance to change it correctly. I don't know with Jm...at the time it seemed like he flubbed but my gut says he just got caught up in what me and Lab were trying to say and didn't understand it the first few times. I don't know, it may take some time before I can make a decision on him.

DD's vote made little sense in my mind and it looks like 2H's reasoning was pretty much the same. Honestly, if Pir played well last time by laying low why would he change it up and bring more attention to it when asked? Seems counterproductive to me.

Chill, you said you thought Pir was scummiest when you were on earlier so you put your vote there. What exactly made you think that? I can only see you questioning him helping Bally but was there anything more substantial than that?

I decided to look back at the votes and while UN helped kill Pir it was JMs vote that sealed it. JM could have voted UN but that would have been the tying vote and without knowing if anymore votes would fall on either was the safer vote to take out an innocent.

you are really trying to get other people on my case so fast, arent you Labby?

Is this why Lab got hit? Did you know she wasn't going to let go of you once she got her teeth into you?

Whew!! This took me longer then I anticipated! My vote will most likely go to either Pir or 2H. I will probably be the third on either so I expect to take a grilling for it, but we cannot have a tie.....

This statement really bothers me. Does an innocent ever care about being the 3rd on? This actually drops 2H a bit for me which sucks because I can so see a case for him. I don't see why she would care about being 3rd on except that she knew she would be killing an innocent. Fortunately she was able to be 1st on an different possible innocent that had lots of people looking his way.


I'm going to vote now I can always change if needed as long as the other player is one I think is scum. Right now that would be Noods JM DD

I vote to shank Noods

 

[jpappy789]

I know Jm's vote was the one that actually killed Pir, but the point is that UN kept saying that he wasn't sure of his vote but never actually changed it. I didn't exactly type up what I meant there since it probably wouldn't have been a great idea for him to move because it could have resulted in a tie, but I'm more concerned that User never even addressed that his vote was still on Pir. It would have made sense if he said something along the lines of not changing his vote because of the tie issue, or even just to save himself...but he just kept saying that he was unsure.

 

[jm1212]

I know Jm's vote was the one that actually killed Pir, but the point is that UN kept saying that he wasn't sure of his vote but never actually changed it. I didn't exactly type up what I meant there since it probably wouldn't have been a great idea for him to move because it could have resulted in a tie, but I'm more concerned that User never even addressed that his vote was still on Pir. It would have made sense if he said something along the lines of not changing his vote because of the tie issue, or even just to save himself...but he just kept saying that he was unsure.

At that point I could have placed it on either him or UN. Putting it in UN would have given a tie which would have resulted in no shanking. Or, I could have wasted my vote on someone that wasn't even in the running, like DD. I voted Pir only because I thought he was a snitch, and my not being able to get to the thread until late delayed my vote. I don't usually like to vote on the first chronological day of day 1 because it is so hard to tell.

 

[jm1212]

to be clear, site mods can edit posts but the posts will still indicate that the post has been edited and it asks for reason of edit. And Pap is right, there is no reset button that puts the post back to the original post.... once it's changed, it's changed for good.... however, I would think that was a handy little tool to have if possible and it might be, just not on this board.




still not sure how and where to take this whole edit..... and jm, it looks like you are saying he edited it, then once busted, went and edited it again.... is that right?


btw, Ice... in regards to your post saying that you didn't understand my theory on Pir, I wouldn't be comfortable if we understood where each other's heads were at in the game anyway.

To me it looked like he edited it more than once to try to return it to almost like it was. The post definitely changed length.

 

[jm1212]

Ok thanks, glad that was cleared up.



So everyone that suspects UN is a snitch? How big is that team? I count 5 that voted him, I'm guessing they are all your suspects? Plus others that have him as suspects but didn't vote him. I do agree though I don't think he is on a team and I think you know this.



I disagree User, I've tried that tactic a lot in the past, usually gets me lynched though so I've kind of backed off that strategy.


RB has been playing differently this game. Its day 2 and he hasn't complained about the rules yet.

I'm kind of leaning towards 2H Noods JM and DD as my suspects.

2H for not wanting to vote for Vixen and knowing Zaffy wasn't a snitch plus todays dance around questions.

JM- I gave the benefit of doubt yesterday but now he is chasing Bally? No vets that you suspect? A statement he made to UN doesn't sit well and sits even less well after I saw Noods use it too.

Noods- Questioning Bally and Vixen, using JMs post to question UN.

DD- Still don't understand her theory on Pir. I saw a case against him but not in that scenario.


I wanted to pull the posts I was talking about with JM and Noods tag team of UN.







Just doesn't feel right to me add in the posts against noobs and it looks like they are trying to stay away from vets and get easy lynches.

The only reason I seem to be going after UN is because he decided to go off on me all of a sudden. Bally has been quesionable this entire game with her sudden absolute knowhow about game mechanics and lingo.

As for vets that I suspect, something isn't sitting well with some of pappy's posts, but at this point I'm not exactly sure what it is. Same thing with zaffy. His sarcasm is almost too good...like he wants us to think he is merely being sarcastic.