I'd really rather not bring up this issue again, but the wording of this part of the post really made me look closer. This would have happened regardless of if it was geared towards me or not. You state yourself that you are reading things the way you want to see them, not the way they are. There are some thing in his game you need to read in between the lines for, but there are others that you need to take at face value. Those posts being geared towards UN didn't have a secret target of myself now matter what your first accusatory post of me said.
Jm...
Again, the point is UN used your post with the mistake and you didn't correct any of it until it was brought to your attention.
You read those posts, did you not, even if they were not directed at you? Didn't it make you wonder what it all meant? Did you go back and read what UN had said, that he used YOUR post?
That post was about why I originally had quoted all that. Lab didn't clarify who it was directed at until after I posted. No mistake on my part since I was not aware they were not intended for you to answer.
But she said herself that it made no difference since you were oblivious to the entire mistake until I brought it to your attention. Whether those were directed at you or not makes little difference when you look at the entire situation. The situation that you tried to stay out of...