Hmm, you make a valid point. I would have never even noticed the change in my reasoning like that. creepy. Lets see if i can decifer my own thoughts...
I was looking at it from the point of veiw of the murderer. They would want to remove or ally the best players first, and early in the game before those players can make a stand. Cause what if those players were right? They would need to change stance to keep the murderer alive. So, if I was the murderer i would get the best players first, then, after that, go for those who can change their stance or are already going for innocents.
Hope that helped in some way or another...
Well, when you put it that way... I was throwing around names, which was more, is more, then most if not all the rest of the town has done. I had nothin to go on ecept my bad memory of other games, so i did da best i could. If you want to vote me for at least trying to look under stones, do so!
It was definitely short sighted. I chose, from the top of my head, who i would have picked. I also asked who others would have picked, as far as i know, no one answered that part of my post except JP, and his answer was tha he wouldn't know who he would pick.
Ok, so instead i'll do what the rest of the town was doing, nothing. I would like to note that most of the people who came and read my posts went for me and seem blind to most other stuff. I was digging. The rest of you were not. Am i gonna be attacked for digging and giving out opinions now?
If i was the murderer i would have chose at least 1 of them, even if i said their name, cause that would make them look innocent if i died and turned evil. Not being the Murderer, i told the truth, thats who i would pick.
Note to self: Next time your playing a mafia game and the town is dead silent, just do as they do and stay silent. Because actually doing something paints a target on your back.
You will most definitely hear my thoughts as time goes on, trust me, that will only be a problem if the town continues to attack those that speak up. Then i will just have to die again and again.
[/B]
You lost me at "attention"
True, that is a pretty big hole in my logic. I was srta thinking that by day 2 (maybe even b4 day 1 ends) there would be more to go on. But if there wasn't, then yes, go for the ones you think would have been chosen by the murderer, which IMO would be the vets.
Another hole, but this one minor. If it was a newb, then as the newb got advice, the town would be able to tell who was getting said advice.
Another hole, my theory is starting to look like swiss cheeseYes, if you see someone you think is scummy, go for it. What i was saying was pure speculation on what i would have done and what i though others hay have done if evil. It was not based on any posts at all.
yes, i do think a vet would take that long, after all, these people would be their teammates for the entire game, you must choose carefully and not make a dumb mistake. Vets would know better then to impulsively choose a teammate. The murderer must first look at all the options, and then decide who would be the best match. Is this player a enemy so you can distance and have it look natural? Is this player someone who you get along with to avoid arguments? Would this player be helpful or a potential time bomb? Can this player hide if necessary? Can this player change their mind and not be called out? Can this player stay quiet and not be called out? Has this player already made a stand against your team or yourself?(not as important that early, but for later knowledge). And most importantly, who can make looking like a team seem natural and unconnected? Those are the things i would consider before making my choice, before adding anyone onto my team. Its a lot to think about, so i assume it would take a long time. And thats why a vet would take that long to figure out who to choose. A newb would be more likely to be impulsive, not taking their time or reviewing such questions, just choosing a teammate cause their name sounds cool.
Now, i have several thoughts right now. First thought: It seems that both you and wiz are after me, now, as my thought process describes, you two would be a perfect mach. You can agree without many people noticing, and your both vets so you can also make minor distancing and maneuvering without it being noticed. So answer me this: Why is it that wiz came in a went after me, then you come in and do the same thing?
Now, i wonder what the responses will be? This is not a BS post, i have tried to answer all of your questions truthfully. I have put my thoughts out there as well, so now lets see how the town rips it apart.
<blink blink>
Wow, FF. That was a very detailed and thorough response from you.
I'm quite impressed, actually. The answers you gave satisfy all the questions I posed very well. I seriously doubt I'd even be able to respond to my own questions that.. succinctly.
Now, who are you really... ??
And what have you done with Fishfriend?
lmao.I am sorry, btw, if you feel you're being picked on by me. You just happened to be the first person who produced a rather detailed theory along with a whole laundry list of suspects for us to lynch, and in order of priority...... that naturally attracts some attention your way, as it also raises questions.
The main thing I'm most curious about now is this:
Could you please tell us WHEN you came up with all those detailed strategy considerations about the murderer's pick possibilities?
Was it last night while you were busily posting silly nonsense in the game thread about you and your stepbrother. Was it last night after you told us goodnight in the game thread and were (presumably) going to sleep? Was it early this morning before you went to school around the time Lady G made that "shiver" post? Or was it later still during a time we already know the murderer and their teammate are able to communicate with each other?
