Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[AC] Tree_Hugger;2588846 said:
Could you please point out what arguments you agree with?

Nem had/has a poor vote (voted maelstrom for "making a reference to his real name and trying to use that as an excuse why he isn't evil), he (for some reason) wanted us to know who was who, was trying to make small things like "I have played 3 games a while ago" and trys to turn them into something big. These things seem scummy to me, that's all.
 
[AC] Tiburon321;2588914 said:
I wanted to pull these and figure out why so many votes are on Nemesis. I do have to say, Nemesis hasn't gone out of their way to build a case on anyone, nor have I seen much contribution from them.

That is, in my eyes, another reason to vote him. He seems to be trying to blend in, but it's not working to well for him.
 
[AC] BadHaggis;2588936 said:
Nem had/has a poor vote (voted maelstrom for "making a reference to his real name and trying to use that as an excuse why he isn't evil), he (for some reason) wanted us to know who was who, was trying to make small things like "I have played 3 games a while ago" and trys to turn them into something big. These things seem scummy to me, that's all.
A lot of poor reasons are given for voting day 1, especially early on. Why was Nem's vote any poorer than C-notes? He voted for me based on his gut.
 
[AC] RICKETS;2588930 said:
Wow, jokes don't translate well in Mafia, noted. I made the comment as a joke to the comments made towards my first comment. I read several games that I didn't play in where people talked over and over about this mystical third vote. I should have known it would be over scrutinized, especially on Day 1.
Can you answer why you didn't "joke" about a third vote on Nem then?
 
I find it interesting that HH thought it was from the innocent pm. Was this because he never got the innocent PM? To me it seems like it does. Now only if I could bold o. This dammed mobile site.

Let's see if Mad takes this because I can't bold...
I retract my vote for narwhal and vote to lynch HH.
 
You can use tags to bold when posting from a phone. [ b ] then [/b] Take the spaces out of the first .
 
[AC] UhOhChongo;2588644 said:
Doomsday, I don't know what to make of your posts so far.

Yes, I will admit that the wood/would thing could be worth watching. So could bringing it up. Is bringing it up vote worthy? I don't know at this early stage of the game.

You act as if you know that TH is playing. Is he playing and in your scum den? Was your post to him a warning so he doesn't slip? I think this bears watching as well.


but on the smae token if he was in fact palying and we were on a scum team wouldent i just tell him in the outer game thread?

Why risk the suspission? (yes i miss spelled get over it)
 
[AC] Tiburon321;2588941 said:
A lot of poor reasons are given for voting day 1, especially early on. Why was Nem's vote any poorer than C-notes? He voted for me based on his gut.

Gut is a valid reason on day one, IMO. Not a good one, but valid. Now you post it out though, C-notes vote on you does seem weird. But IDT that evils would actually go out and do something like that. Of course, then he could be hiding... stupid reverse phycology (or whatever it's called).
 
[AC] maelstrom;2588943 said:
I find it interesting that HH thought it was from the innocent pm. Was this because he never got the innocent PM? To me it seems like it does. Now only if I could bold o. This dammed mobile site.

Let's see if Mad takes this because I can't bold...
I retract my vote for narwhal and vote to lynch HH.
fixed :)
 
[AC] BadHaggis;2588948 said:
Gut is a valid reason on day one, IMO. Not a good one, but valid. Now you post it out though, C-notes vote on you does seem weird. But IDT that evils would actually go out and do something like that. Of course, then he could be hiding... stupid reverse phycology (or whatever it's called).

Post=Point. IDK how that happened...
 
AquariaCentral.com