Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

Just wanted to through this out there before I go back to continue rereading from day 1 to present. I have to say that I was also flustered at reading the people commenting about not wanting to tie it up prior to nightfall.

Yes, as it turns out, those up for the lynch were innocent. In that case a tie could have cut our losses. We would have lost only 2 last night instead of three.

If I remember correctly, C-note commented on how quiet it was prior to nightfall and that the scum must have liked how things were going. I plan to look into those that didn't want to tie it up and those that were after C-note and HI IQ so strongly.
 
Vote Count (thru post 726) - red indicates retracted vote

HI IQ (5) - Nar 434, O3T 458, Nem 510, Tree 525, RICK 535, chup 663
Doom (4) - wing 482, Gun 542, C-note 550, UhOh 645, Tib 722
Nem (2) - HI IQ 537, Driver 621
Tib (2) - scoop 658, BH 667
C-note (1) - Doom 460
O3T (1) - Gun 578
Driver (1) - O3T 635
Scoop (0) - Tib 558
No Lynch (2) - gold 618, mael 657

All have voted.

Nightfall in 35 minutes (8 pm CST). PMs as required, please.
What sticks out to me here are the two votes retracted on known innocents (HI IQ and Doom). Seems really odd to me that both would retract to put a singleton vote out there, unless either one or both are scum and didn't want their names tied to a lynched innocent.

Gun has been very much flying under the radar. I'm thinking someone has them under control elsewhere. That vote retraction off of Hi IQ and moved to O3T could have served dual purposes if Gun and O3T are teammates: make sure you're not on the innocent getting the lynch and also distance from a teammate at the same time. Neither Gun nor O3T voted for HH either on night 1.

[AC] HI IQ;2590219 said:
Now I must eat crow....it was NOT Wing that mis represented it was gun....there is more, but had to correct myself before nightfall
This now seems very interesting to me. Gun misrepresenting things.

[AC] xx_Nemesis_xx;2590265 said:
With Gold Member, if what I think is going on is going on, they have a legitimate excuse.
How do you know who Nem is and that their excuse is legitimate?
 
[AC] UhOhChongo;2590429 said:
Just wanted to through this out there before I go back to continue rereading from day 1 to present. I have to say that I was also flustered at reading the people commenting about not wanting to tie it up prior to nightfall.

Yes, as it turns out, those up for the lynch were innocent. In that case a tie could have cut our losses. We would have lost only 2 last night instead of three.

If I remember correctly, C-note commented on how quiet it was prior to nightfall and that the scum must have liked how things were going. I plan to look into those that didn't want to tie it up and those that were after C-note and HI IQ so strongly.
I was one of those who commented that I didn't want to tie it up. When I said that, I thought both Hi IQ and Doom were scum so I did not want to do anything to help the scum team. Closer to nightfall with no one making any moves, I got very concerned that Hi IQ was actually innocent so I then moved my vote to Doom. In hindsight, I probably should have moved to Doom earlier. Regardless, with Doom's behavior right before nightfall I thought for sure they were scum. I would have taken that same shot had I been vig.
 
So Scoop, was this another set up? I mean, you were arguing with C-note just before nightfall and they were the one who got hit.
 
[AC] Tiburon321;2590447 said:
So Scoop, was this another set up? I mean, you were arguing with C-note just before nightfall and they were the one who got hit.

I didn't notice this before, but that is a good question. I too would like to know.

Scoops play, it seems to me, has been calculated. There have been things that bear watching but nothing in and of itself that was vote worthy.
 
[AC] UhOhChongo;2590466 said:
I didn't notice this before, but that is a good question. I too would like to know.

Scoops play, it seems to me, has been calculated. There have been things that bear watching but nothing in and of itself that was vote worthy.

When I placed that vote on them, I couldn't decided between Hi IQ and Doom, and the more I thought about it the more their "set up" comment bugged me. Part of my vote was to see how Scoop would react (which was with an OMGUS) and I also wanted to see who else would react to my vote on Scoop. Turns out Haggis decided to protect Scoop and follow with a vote on me.

I also don't like how Scoop needs to keep reading, yet never seems to comment much on what they've read (save the long post against me).
 
[AC] Driver8;2590269 said:
Doom was the vigilant hit.
Ok, I see. Sorry, I was kind of confused.
[AC] Tiburon321;2590447 said:
So Scoop, was this another set up? I mean, you were arguing with C-note just before nightfall and they were the one who got hit.
That right there is a valid point. I have seen that strategy used rather effectively before as a scum.
 
Well, I just woke up, I didn't end up getting home until 12:30 last night, so I'm sorry I wasn't around at nightfall. I also just realized that it's at 9 EST, not 10. :werd:
anyways, I'm rereading now.
 
Well, I just woke up, I didn't end up getting home until 12:30 last night, so I'm sorry I wasn't around at nightfall. I also just realized that it's at 9 EST, not 10. :werd:
anyways, I'm rereading now.

I wonder if you just realized you posted under your real user name, not the game alias you were assigned. :lol:
 
AquariaCentral.com