Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] RICKETS]

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

lololololol

 

[[AC] narwhal]

Day 1 votes again

HH (8) - chup 277, wing 310, Tib 320, Nar 323, gold 363, Nem 368, Tree 383, mael 385
Nem (5) - Driver 261, HH 269, Gun 278, BH 292, HI IQ 361
Scoop (2) - wing 168, Doom 196, Star 274
C-note (1) - O3T 192
UhOh (1) - RICK 237
Doom (1) - UhOh 271
Tib (1) - C-note 272
Star (1) - scoop 297
O3T (0) - RICK 186
Gun (0) - **BH 275**
Chup (0) - HI IQ 295
Mael (0) - Nem 236
RICK (0) - HI IQ 322
Nar (0) - mael 240, gold 268

The purple is scum, lime is known innocent, red is retracted, red underline is retracted by a known innocent. ** is a retracted scum vote.

My analysis doesn't look so crazy now does it?

Which analysis? The one that says I'm scum for putting vote #4 on HH? Yes, that still looks crazy, as if you drink paint thinner in fact.

 

[[AC] Driver8]

Interesting logic and you spelled it all right too.

 

[[AC] scoop411]

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

Anywho, "Rich" he did jump on too. His voting position is actually interesting, as he could've easily put out a vote on BH earlier or later but chose to vote soon enough that he wouldn't be suspected as jumping on, but nor far enough away to not condemn a potential team-mate.

If the real tracker could please speak up, then it would show why scum would vote off a goon to save Rickets. (I'm thinking that if Rickets is lying, he is either: A) The Snoop, who the goons will protect at any cost OR B) a jerk for RCing to save himself and get a team-mate lynched) I suspect the first option as more likely, although this is assuming that Rickets is EVIL.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

I read nothing, I was happy I got here in time. He still has a bad attitude.

I am glad you did not UD as I absolutely hate UDs. I do not understand why you placed your vote how you did. I do not think I am the one with the bad attitude.

An explanation of why you voted for Haggis would be appreciated.

 

[[AC] scoop411]

I said your votes stick out to me based on when they were made. I also noted I needed to go back and read both of your arguments against Haggis. If you had bothered to read my post you would not have had to ask that. You also would know why I highlighted Rickets as a known innocent.

um, I do not remember seeing why Rickets is a known innocent.

And how is my timing scummy, I've been voting for BH ever since he jumped onto you after I voted you D2. (Technically I voted for him first on D3, but my case against him started on D2)

 

[[AC] scoop411]

Yes, that still looks crazy, as if you drink paint thinner in fact.

En english pleaso?

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Anywho, "Rich" he did jump on too. His voting position is actually interesting, as he could've easily put out a vote on BH earlier or later but chose to vote soon enough that he wouldn't be suspected as jumping on, but nor far enough away to not condemn a potential team-mate.

If the real tracker could please speak up, then it would show why scum would vote off a goon to save Rickets. (I'm thinking that if Rickets is lying, he is either: A) The Snoop, who the goons will protect at any cost OR B) a jerk for RCing to save himself and get a team-mate lynched) I suspect the first option as more likely, although this is assuming that Rickets is EVIL.

Who are you referring to with voting position?

What makes you assume Rickets is evil? Obviously the proper use of a RC in a game eludes you if you think that was a poor move on Rickets part if they really are a PR. This is not early in day 1 get yourself into trouble and can only save yourself with a RC crap.

Scoop, I'd been wanting to lean you innocent, but this post shot you right up on the scummy list. Suddenly you seem very nervous and aggressive. Grieving for Haggis?

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

Anywho, "Rich" he did jump on too. His voting position is actually interesting, as he could've easily put out a vote on BH earlier or later but chose to vote soon enough that he wouldn't be suspected as jumping on, but nor far enough away to not condemn a potential team-mate.

If the real tracker could please speak up, then it would show why scum would vote off a goon to save Rickets. (I'm thinking that if Rickets is lying, he is either: A) The Snoop, who the goons will protect at any cost OR B) a jerk for RCing to save himself and get a team-mate lynched) I suspect the first option as more likely, although this is assuming that Rickets is EVIL.

What a wishy washy back peddling post. First you ask the "real" tracker to speak up. That implies I AM lying. Then you say I RCed to save myself, yet the person I was up against was a team mate.... Then you say I am the Snoop, so I saved my butt by fake RCing... Then you go back to using words like suspect more likely, assuming... You either think I am scum or you don't, but I think you know very well that I am really the Tracker.

I vote to lynch Scoop

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

um, I do not remember seeing why Rickets is a known innocent.

And how is my timing scummy, I've been voting for BH ever since he jumped onto you after I voted you D2. (Technically I voted for him first on D3, but my case against him started on D2)

Since your reading skills seem to be suddenly lacking (amazing with all the re-reading you do), here ya go:

Known innocent in green, known scum in purple. Yes, I am calling Rickets a known innocent since Haggis fought their claim and tried to refute what Rickets said with the block being used night 3. In my mind Rickets is telling the truth after the outcome of this nightfall.

Votes that stick out to me most:

• Driver with the last minute vote drop without any sort of explanation on someone who was the obvious lynch.
• O3T voting the same as known scum
• Those who were not on Haggis

Votes on Haggis that stick out aside from Driver:

• Nar was on early, may not have been able to back out. Need to look at their argument
• Scoop for the same reasoning as Nar