Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] Old3Toes]

Anyone who stays on me when I have RCed and there is no counterclaim is as scummy as they come or has no idea how to play mafia...

It is simple math Rick. We have had 3 lynches. We will have our fourth one today. You are either completely confused or lying.

Vote Count (thru post 1163) - red indicates retracted vote

BH (7) - nar 979, scoop 1011, RICK 1065, mael 1108, Tib 1123, Nem 162, Driver 1163
RICK (2) - Tree 1032, UhOh 1037, Tib 1092, Nem 1093
Driver (2) - O3T 988, BH 1000
UhOh (1) - chup 1054

All have voted.

Nightfall in 1/2 hour (8 pm CST). PMs as required, please.

Rickets makes a statement that I agree with. With no counterclaim then there is no reason to doubt Rickets, but UhOh still doubts Rickets. UhOh could have moved to off of Rickets, but did not. Also Tree stayed, I am not sure if they had a chance to move or not. UhOh was around and was active.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Rickets makes a statement that I agree with. With no counterclaim then there is no reason to doubt Rickets, but UhOh still doubts Rickets. UhOh could have moved to off of Rickets, but did not. Also Tree stayed, I am not sure if they had a chance to move or not. UhOh was around and was active.

O3T, you pulled those out of context, or didn't read on that Rickets was confused with days.

I don't agree with the first statement by Rickets, but I already explained why I think that statement is erroneous.

 

[[AC] Old3Toes]

Some intersting Driver8 activity (after nightfall)

We got another one. That was a good job. I am sorry for my absence, I will be back to normal tomorrow evening.

Sort of implies that he will not be back until tomorrow evening, but Tibs asks for an explaination.

Care to explain your vote at least before we don't see you again for a while?

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

I read nothing, I was happy I got here in time. He still has a bad attitude.

Interesting logic and you spelled it all right too.

I got here very late, I ran upstairs from a meeting voted the guy in the lead who I never saw as all that trustworthy anyway. I was not going to vote now one.

Quite a few posts for someone who seemed to be leaving. Then attempts to defend scoop.

I do not see how Tib could be scum, he put the kill vote on Haggis and has been gung ho this whole game.

I see Tib's arguments on Scoop and I may go that way. What bothers me is he is the second vote on Haggis. That is a risky move when there were plenty of better targets to go on, like me for instance, that would not have raised an eyebrow and could easily have gotten me voted off. Of course it would be a great cover.

I think the candidates lurk on those who were on the others not on the top two.

I have been convinced that Driver8 is scum since the "known innocent" comment. I do not know how "easily" it is to vote driver off, but will look forward to that time.

 

[[AC] Old3Toes]

O3T, you pulled those out of context, or didn't read on that Rickets was confused with days.

I don't agree with the first statement by Rickets, but I already explained why I think that statement is erroneous.

Those posts were back to back. So now that nightfall is past, is there any reason not to believe Rickets or to consider Rickets a known innocent?

 

[[AC] Old3Toes]

We got another one. That was a good job. I am sorry for my absence, I will be back to normal tomorrow evening.

As far as I can tell Driver8 did not post at all the following eveining. Is this to be considered normal?

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Those posts were back to back. So now that nightfall is past, is there any reason not to believe Rickets or to consider Rickets a known innocent?

With the "out of context" I meant you didn't add where Rickets admitted to being confused on days, which is what Chongo was saying in the statement you quoted.

I see you missed my earlier post:

I got too excited about the nerd joke.

I can see why someone could doubt Rickets claim before nightfall and not switch. I debated myself, then realized Rickets explanation and the whole thing with scum using the block night 3 made enough sense for me to move my vote. I did take a while to decide though. After nightfall is a very different story. I don't see how anyone could doubt their claim after Haggis showed scum, especially with how Haggis tried to refute it, etc.

There is no reason to not believe Rickets now that nightfall is past and Haggis showed scum. I have been considering Rickets a known innocent since Haggis showed scum. If you look at the color coding for the votes I posted, I already accounted for Rickets being a known innocent.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Looks like there will be a lot of UDs tonight...

If that is the case I will be quite irritated.

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

Still around, good to see you old3toes.

Still no word from mael, chup, or driver. I expect a few last minute votes from some of them driver/rich seems especially prone to it this round

 

[[AC] Old3Toes]

Rickets, I could have missed it, but did you track someone last night and is there anything worth sharing?

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

I found something interesting, but I cant share right now.