Mafia #89 Trouble in Kindergarten

[rich311k]

I disagree, day one, UN was a perfect place for a bully vote. Kashta you just said we hardly ever get day one right.

There is a hint of a reason, all that is ever really needed. UN was voting a very possible UD and he is good at getting into trouble on day one add that he was not very active, perfect safe vote and you get an innocent to boot.

I think a single vote by a late voter sends up more flags than a third vote on UN, especially with a reason to throw out there.

I also thing scum does not just want to hide they look for an easy kill. They got UN.

I vote to lynch Ice.

He fits everything I just said.

 

[Lady G]

I would like to apologize for my lack of participation this round! Even though reading through it looks as though I am not the only one, this is proving to be very difficult as there isn't much to go on.

I do have to agree here, it seems a singleton vote is a safer place to hide and you can claim that you didn't vote off an innocent.

I would like to know from those who had lone votes their reasons.

My vote didn't count and it wasn't actually single, so I guess I don't need to answer this huh?

I would like to know from those who voted UN their reasons personally.

Noods, about your so-called feeling. What was that exactly? Why do you direct our attention to those who voted UN?

You think it's that unlikely that a few innocents might vote off a fellow innocent by mistake on the first day? Personally, I don't find that unusual in these games.

Do you think Username said something that made the scum think he was a good guess as a possible PR?

Wouldn't it actually be easier for the scum to sit back, do nothing, not stir things up, and spread out their own votes to not call attention to themselves instead of "at least one" of them making a move against UN in particular? The town as a whole turned out to be short-sided by spreading our votes around the way we did.

Kash, although I see your point here...this post is kinda bothersome, you know as well as I that when it comes to UN, most the time he ends up getting him self in trouble, and he is normally a easy one to get a "train" going on. Yes, I know there wasn't a train on him, not my point...I just know he can be a easy one to throw a vote on, sit back, and watch the votes go right to him. I agree with Noods on this that it is VERY likely at least one bully was on him. I highly doubt more then one, but anything is possible in these games.

 

[jbradt]

I do have to agree here, it seems a singleton vote is a safer place to hide and you can claim that you didn't vote off an innocent.

I would like to know from those who had lone votes their reasons.

I put the reason for my vote out there when I made it, Wiz. It wasn't much, but that one post gave me the shivers so I went with my gut. I'm hoping more happens today to have something real to go on.

Rich made this post.



JB quoted Rich and posted this.



JB, why did you prune off the last sentence from Rich's post when you quoted it? It's not a long post.

I pruned off Rich's second statement because my post began with "I agree". I didn't plan on voting randomly from those who voted UN, I snipped that part so as not to confuse people as to my thinking.

 

[IceH2O]

So to all that have pointed out that UN usually makes it easy for him to be lynched, isn't that more reason for the bullies to not have to vote him especially when the votes are spread out?

 

[IceH2O]

I disagree, day one, UN was a perfect place for a bully vote. Kashta you just said we hardly ever get day one right.

There is a hint of a reason, all that is ever really needed. UN was voting a very possible UD and he is good at getting into trouble on day one add that he was not very active, perfect safe vote and you get an innocent to boot.

I think a single vote by a late voter sends up more flags than a third vote on UN, especially with a reason to throw out there.

I also thing scum does not just want to hide they look for an easy kill. They got UN.

I vote to lynch Ice.

He fits everything I just said.

Now I'm going to ask for clarification. Because I don't get this post at all.

The post starts off saying UN was a good place for a bully vote because there was a good reason to vote him.
Then you say a single vote by a late voter is a bigger red flag then the 3rd vote on UN.

But then you vote me the 3rd person on UN.

Shouldn't Noods be your vote Rich? Last vote on a single voter getter and a weaker reason then the reasoning used for UNs vote.

Why would I if a bully be the 3rd voter on UN when he already had 2 votes and could have kept my single vote on FF?

 

[jbradt]

So to all that have pointed out that UN usually makes it easy for him to be lynched, isn't that more reason for the bullies to not have to vote him especially when the votes are spread out?

This actually makes a lot of sense. The thing that takes me back about it is that you were one of those people, Ice. Could also be a really sly way of saying "see, I can't be evil."

Not sure what to think at the moment.

 

[Lady G]

So to all that have pointed out that UN usually makes it easy for him to be lynched, isn't that more reason for the bullies to not have to vote him especially when the votes are spread out?

IMO...it really depends on who the bullies are, what they are thinking, if they are having time to discuss, to many ways it can go, the situation/mind set at the time; to really say if/how they would go with it. If votes are spread out and one decides to make someone the target...it is easy to put your vote there in hopes others will follow/move to take that person out. On the other hand if a couple votes are on a innocent, while votes are spread out, it is also easy for them to singlton vote and not "stand" out.

 

[IceH2O]

Also since I have no idea when night fall is as our teacher seems to be passed out.

I vote to lynch Noods


Until I get a satisfactory answer to my question. I don't understand her vote for Wiz and want to know why he looked more suspect then UN who was sitting on a UD even after being called on it.

I'm also willing to vote Rich because I think his reasoning is erratic at best.

Another question is can anyone point to a better reason to vote someone then UN last night? I don't know who was or wasn't around at night fall except for Noods and LG. If you all were here would you have moved to UN or stayed put and why?

 

[jbradt]

Also since I have no idea when night fall is as our teacher seems to be passed out.

I vote to lynch Noods


Until I get a satisfactory answer to my question. I don't understand her vote for Wiz and want to know why he looked more suspect then UN who was sitting on a UD even after being called on it.

I'm also willing to vote Rich because I think his reasoning is erratic at best.

Another question is can anyone point to a better reason to vote someone then UN last night? I don't know who was or wasn't around at night fall except for Noods and LG. If you all were here would you have moved to UN or stayed put and why?

I wouldn't have changed my vote. I really just didn't see it with UN, and he has a habbit of doing unexplainable crap even when innocent. As much as I wanted to vote for him, I couldn't bring myself to.

 

[Lady G]

Well night fall is in 10 minutes, are you going to change off the UD?


Just in case, you decide not to I retract my vote on FF and vote to lynch UN

Ice, I'm just curious here...how many times have you ever seen a mafia vote a possible UD? I would think for a mafia that would be one of the worst places for your vote, knowing how much attention a vote for a possible UD would draw on themself.

This with the way you appear to be saying no mafia would vote UN, makes me want to say......I VOTE TO LYNCH ICE.