^^ Should have added an "LOL" to show it's joking, not being serious or cranky. Ice and I posted the same question at the same time... lmao. Weird.
Mafia #89 Trouble in Kindergarten
- Thread starter Zaffy
- Start date
^^ Should have added an "LOL" to show it's joking, not being serious or cranky. Ice and I posted the same question at the same time... lmao. Weird.
At first, I presumed FF must be scum too or why wouldn't Zaffy just call the game? I decided not to make that assumption though for several reasons.
1. Mr. Zaffy is a meanie.
2. Just because FF lost access to the site and Zaff knows he will UD at nightfall doesn't mean there's anything that says the game mod HAS TO end the game immediately for that reason. FF didn't PM the mod to quit the game voluntarily, so he still "lives" until his death actually takes place. Technically, the UD doesn't occur until nightfall events happen so why kill the game prematurely?
3. As game mod, Zaffy had to make a choice. If Zaffy ended the game now it would be solely because of FF's behavior. Who wants their game ruined for a reason like that? Counting FF as a UD instead (despite the circumstance) allows the game to still run it's natural course... even that's the same result (game ends).
4. And, most importantly, Mr. Zaffie is a meanie.:
I don't agree that FF's role is a foregone conclusion. We should consider all options, not be short sighted or limit our view of the game based on speculation.
How do you know he didn't PM Zaffy?
2nd bold- There is no reason to continue a game that is over. Its a waste of everyones time. I for one wouldn't be going back and forth looking for things I might have missed and could be doing many other things.
Forget it I see he was banned.
Still think if he was innocent game would have been called.
Good. I was trying to figure out how to answer that without actually saying it myself.
And yes, you might be right. It could go either way. Some would end the game, maybe some wouldn't. I don't know what Zaffy would do.
The only way we can win this is for FF to be scum and the lynch be scum. That takes us to 1 evil vs. 3 town.
If FF is innocent, we lose both ways regardless of whether we lynch a townie or scum (either 3 evil vs. 1 town.... or 2 evil vs. 2 town). We also lose if FF is scum and we lynch a townie since that results in a tie.
If FF is innocent, we lose both ways regardless of whether we lynch a townie or scum (either 3 evil vs. 1 town.... or 2 evil vs. 2 town). We also lose if FF is scum and we lynch a townie since that results in a tie.
This is what I have so far.
3 Wiz - Ice(292) Rich(342) DD(344)
1 Ice - Wiz(329)
0 Kash - JB(332)
1 DD - JB(338)
No vote from Kash, FF will UD.
3 Wiz - Ice(292) Rich(342) DD(344)
1 Ice - Wiz(329)
0 Kash - JB(332)
1 DD - JB(338)
No vote from Kash, FF will UD.
Scum is being lynched. Unless you don't vote on an innocent player and they last minute switch to vote who you do.
3 Wizard - Ice Rich DD
1 Ice - Wizard
Kashta - JB
1 DD - JB
No Votes: Kashta FF
I've been staring at the votes trying to figure out the best way to vote.
I vote to lynch Wizard.
If Wizard isn't evil, we're done for. If I vote Ice or JB or DD or anyone else, I think 2 evil vote switches control the lynch.
1 Ice - Wizard
Kashta - JB
1 DD - JB
No Votes: Kashta FF
I've been staring at the votes trying to figure out the best way to vote.
I vote to lynch Wizard.
If Wizard isn't evil, we're done for. If I vote Ice or JB or DD or anyone else, I think 2 evil vote switches control the lynch.
