Mafia 9: The Bloody Coup

[bkw1982]

Well if we look at past games the idea of voting no one has be brought up several times, but we saw an example of this when the doc saved mike in a previous game. Mike wasnt lynched so no information was gained, to me that proves that voting no one doesnt help anyone but urself.

Emma we got lucky with DP when he didnt post last game, but she hasnt played before so complete wild card.

as of right now im goin to redirect my attention to

jpappy-post very positive up beat messages but not much else

mad-ur avatar......to obvious to be a hint but i think works well to confuse and distract ppl. just enough to hesitate on votes

emma-wont vote her but she needs to post soon, or atleast email ice

IMO i think the votes are being spread out to make it more difficult to pick out rebels by voting. Since i dont see a really obvious case built by anyone i will go from my own list.

I vote to lynch mad

My reasons are
1. The avatar is to obvious, mad is a good player and this would be a smart idea to delay votes on him.

2.

Here's the thing...let's say the citizens lynch incorrectly on night one, and score gets to 8 citizens vs. 10 rebels. Is there anything in the rules to prevent the rebels from identifying themselves to each other in the thread? Assuming that they do that (while they have a numbers advantage), they can then just run the table on the citizens.

This question IMO should have been asked via pm. You just gave the rebels a good idea or ur trying to signal the other side so u can work together. The highlighted passage is what lead me to believe this reasoning. Hopefully u read the rules and know there isnt anything in the rules that say they couldnt......and thats why i think u were tryin to send a message to ur counterparts. Luckily Ice saw this post and posted a ruling on it.


3. Post 302, which is a list of mee-mees post, and this is at the end of the post:

Now keep in mind I'm definitely NOT saying that Joander is a concerned citizen. In my mind he's still got a 50% chance of being rebel scum. But in rereading all of his posts, nothing really strikes me as being that scummy, yet. Not enough for Mee-mee to keep coming at the guy 4 different times, and then going on to vote for someone else.

Does he realize that he just did the same thing mee-mee did with jpappy? The post was valid until the last statment, why would u type that unless u feared someone making a connection between u and joander.

Unless there is an obvious slip up by someone else my vote stays on mad

 

[Hooked Newbie]

I could be wrong, but by my count 3 people have 3 votes each (Jo, Mee-mee, & DC). In the interest of the Country, I would ask that with 2 1/2 hours left the CCs with a single vote reconsider and vote for the one of the 3 they suspect most. Single votes at this point are wasted votes and a great way for rebels to hide IMO.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

IMO i think the votes are being spread out to make it more difficult to pick out rebels by voting.

I vote to lynch mad

Didn't you just do that very thing? And the AV thing was started (to my knowledge) with the mayor bee that you're still using.

 

[bkw1982]

I could be wrong, but by my count 3 people have 3 votes each (Jo, Mee-mee, & DC). In the interest of the Country, I would ask that with 2 1/2 hours left the CCs with a single vote reconsider and vote for the one of the 3 they suspect most. Single votes at this point are wasted votes and a great way for rebels to hide IMO.

i just made that point in my previous post. 10 ppl have votes for em right now, i got that from Zs update post number 359.

3- mee mee
3- jo
2-DC

none of these are on my list and im not completely convinced by the cases, but i do agree with you.

 

[bkw1982]

Didn't you just do that very thing? And the AV thing was started (to my knowledge) with the mayor bee that you're still using.

i stated why i voted for mad and why i didnt select anyone that already had a vote on em. u posted while i was typin and in the post directly after urs i stated i agreed and im goin back to read the cases. yup but my avatar wasnt obvious, and no one got it except KOTD.....his is to obvious IMO

 

[mee-mee]

plzz show me where I am being very defensive...my vote stands...

Ok, here's my "list" for now. There's not a ton to go on yet, but I want to get it out for discussion and reaction.

mee-mee: IMO, she has been very defensive about general observations and seemed to be trying to add confusion early. Also the post count that Rb posted is interesting. And, no this is not in "reprisal" for voting for me. That vote without a case was helpful.

CL: Opposite end of the posting spectrum, seems to be jumping in and reading a single page to get a quick meaningless post out. Z's analysis seemed on point.

Deputy: Same as above and quick to vote.

DD: Just kind of a gut feel on this, but I could be wrong. Her posting style seems like previous games, but she always makes me nervous.

JL: Something just doesn't seem right. I'll re-read and try to post my reasons.

Sov: Her defense of being questioned last night took awhile (could be valid reasons for that), but even when it did come, it was weak IMO. Also, I think she's played enough not to have to do the "I don't get it" thing anymore.

I'd like to see other CCs thoughts today. I'll not vote yet, but if I had to it would be squarely on mee-mee.

/// List Off ///

Plantling- I made a mistake in addressing you about the "me dying early thing". I was actually referring to a list that JL posted (217). Sorry, I had alot of catching up to do after work and my notes apparently were wrong.[/quo


And again show me plzzz...

my list now as it stands:
mee mee- overall defensiveness
deputy- quick to hop on trains, but doesnt seem to be trying to find any evidence
i dont have a solid third now, but emma lack of posting yet concerns me
Note: when i was mafia i asked for people lists all the time, as i wanted to know if i was on their list. Are you asking because you wanna see if your on any lists yet RB?

 

[jpappy789]

DC seems to be beating around the bush...3 votes on him and no comments? Even the best players in here get at least a little defensive and try to keep people from voting for them...

BKW I don't like your mad vote. He is acting different than previous games where he is usually pretty gung ho, but your evidence is weak IMO. I think mad is someone to watch, not vote for on night 1.

 

[jpappy789]

One person who is acting waaaaaaay different is Charles...Sir Stubbs where art thou?

 

[Hooked Newbie]

i stated why i voted for mad and why i didnt select anyone that already had a vote on em. u posted while i was typin and in the post directly after urs i stated i agreed and im goin back to read the cases. yup but my avatar wasnt obvious, and no one got it except KOTD.....his is to obvious IMO

We are typing at the same time apparently. I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I think we need some sort of focus. There are 10 of them out they're on 2 teams so quite a few people's strongest feelings may be right. We need to make sure that they don't spread things out and make the CCs votes null. We have 3 vote getters running even right now so a vote cast on someone else is pretty useless to the Country at this point. Just my 2 cents.

I hope the Doctor is focused on figuring out and protecting the BG and Detective...

 

[KingOfTheDeep]

DD, its because your vote DOESNT make sense.

...guys lets be honest does anyone SEE ANY REASON WHAT SO EVER to lynch me because i called them townies not villagers? why on earth would that be a reason to lynch someone...???

Makes no sense at all.

And KOTD, what would you like me to say ? IM INNOCENT IM INNOCENT IM INNOCENT?

Where does that get me? I have explained why i voted early, and i have retracted both votes i felt were incorrect, and now my vote stands where i think it should be, on DC.

lynch me if you want guys, go ahead i mean what on earth was i thinking saying villagers instead of townies... i must be mafia... or oh wait its rebels isnt it. Now im def. a bad guy kill me quick... LOL

lets be honest, DD saying what you have said makes you look like nothing but mafia to any citizen that has half a brain.

that is not why we are voting for you, stop insisting it was that..that makes it seem as though you are trying to put heat on DD, a typical mafia/rebel/ww tactic.

you retracted both votes because people questioned them.

we're voting for you because of your super-early-no-evidence lynch vote, your over-defensiveness and your senseless vote on me after i questioned your status as a CC, which is another evil-doer tactic...at least..thats why im voting for you..if i'm wrong..then sorry..if im right...then all hail the king LOL :grinyes: