Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

[noodles62]

Where exactly did I suggest that I was a member of the Mafia team? Or maybe a better question, where did I suggest that I didn't have the option of using my zombie hit if lynched?

*sigh* As I already pointed out - here -

I agree that the the player who now has the option to hit someone based on a gut feeling should think long and hard about whether or not it is worth it. However, Since they do not have any connection to a particular team but the zombies, I would hate to see someone go easy in a game like this. If I were to be linched and had the option of hitting someone to help the zombie team, I'd take it but that's just me. Just some open advice, any zombies who decide to use their hit should pay very close attention to the next days events.

..

I take this to mean that if you are lynched, you don't have the option. JMO and I like it.

 

[jpappy789]

I never said you believed that mafia turned into zombies. I said (perhaps not clearly) that you insinuated that you did not have the option of taking a zombie hit if you were lynched. Ihe only people that do not have the option of a zombie hit are mafia - which indicates that you are mafia.

I am still on the fence with Tank. his explaination seems confused at best, but willing to watch for now. That being said, I vote to lynch Razz.

Noods, you're not including the fact that zombies do not have to use the hit they are given. Thus, they have the option of using the hit.

Razz may have slipped but it is unfair to not consider the wording the other way.

 

[[AC] C-note]

I do not understand why instead of focusing on the actual logic (or lack thereof) in some of Jm's posts you are focusing on the fact that he listed three people as common players he felt mafia would hide behind. What about the list is scummy?



Maybe it's just semantics but was there anything that didn't involve FF that you would like to comment on?



Hmmm, well it's not a great way to gauge contribution but seeing as DDay had, unless I am mistaken, all of one post less than YOU (at the time of the post) would you consider yourself immune from a lynch vote too since you aren't contributing either? When did contribution amount ever decide when a person is able to get a vote? In fact most votes seem to happen BECAUSE someone is not contributing...

quantity and quality are very different things, yes I had low post at the time. It was D1, I work 8 hr shifts, babysit and have a social life, so forgive me for not being here to enjoy the banter. I feel I am contributing more than logging on to post random jab then logging off. And I never once said or implied that I am immune to anything.

 

[IceH2O]

And which term is this "overused" one that you are referring to?

As far as Razz's alignment, I'm not sure that he's scum, but he's the best I've got right now. As I said in an earlier post I don't follow his logic, and faulty logic can often be a scumtell... He did/said something that doesn't make sense, based on something else he said. While trying to blend in, scum often throw this tell.

You, on the other hand, made up a scenario in your head as to how some players could be either innocent OR scum, and decided to call them on it.... Huh? Based on the scenario that you've created, you've decided that they're either mafia OR town, yet you feel the need to say "I've got my eye on you!"

Right now, everyone should be innocent OR mafia in your head, and you should be watching everyone. Why single out three, when you really have no more information on them than you do on anyone else?

The term that is overused is: Either way, it looks like you've got it covered....we're either innocent or mafia

@ Ice

Doom asked a question of you in post 124 that you seem to have passed over. Care to respond?

Yeah I saw it but I was in a rush trying to get a vote in before walking out the door,I didn't have time to respond

Back here again, I asked before but I will ask again.

What do you think of the other 6 scenarios possible based on these 3 players possible alignments?

I feel like you've set up a false dichotomy here and that's very scummy to me.

other scenarios huh, spell them out for me. The only obvious one to me would be all 3 innocent but that is pretty much implied when the others are scenarios were spelled out.

As FF1 contemplares his fate in the midst of the town, the mafia and zombies he can't take it any more. He goes home and sits in his favorite chair with a slice of his favorite super strewberry cake. He sprinkles just a little bit of iocaine powder on it and eats. Bending to popular demand, FF1 slips quietly into that good night.


FF1 was just an innocent townie.

**** FF, why not just take the lynching, now you've given them a free kill and lost on a chance to maybe ZH a mafia player.


That is as far as I got. Went in early so I could leave mid day put my girls on a plane, came home to eat now back out. I should be able to catch up before night fall.

 

[jpappy789]

quantity and quality are very different things, yes I had low post at the time. It was D1, I work 8 hr shifts, babysit and have a social life, so forgive me for not being here to enjoy the banter. I feel I am contributing more than logging on to post random jab then logging off. And I never once said or implied that I am immune to anything.

Exactly, you implied that Tank's vote on DDay was poorly placed because DDay wasn't contributing. A player not contributing does not make them immune from getting a vote.

And I didn't really ask for any excuses as to your low post count...

 

[RazzleFish]

*sigh* As I already pointed out - here -



I take this to mean that if you are lynched, you don't have the option. JMO and I like it.

Alright so the wording was off. The wording should be "If I were lynched and decided to use my option of hitting someone...."

 

[jpappy789]

If you have some specific event you'd like me to comment on, please share and I'll be happy to respond.

It's not my job to tell you what to comment on, however, it is rather convenient that the only thing you had to comment on was FF and then he withdrew from the game.

 

[[AC] C-note]

Exactly, you implied that Tank's vote on DDay was poorly placed because DDay wasn't contributing. A player not contributing does not make them immune from getting a vote.

And I didn't really ask for any excuses as to your low post count...

again, its not the fact that his vote is on DDay specifically, its the fact that he chose to dump the vote on a very absent player. I would have questioned it just as much if he put the vote on my self, LG or anyone else who was absent. The vote seems like a cop out from having to place it anywhere else.

 

[noodles62]

Noods, you're not including the fact that zombies do not have to use the hit they are given. Thus, they have the option of using the hit.

Razz may have slipped but it is unfair to not consider the wording the other way.

Reread his original post, that I just reposted. I think he did infact slip. I still have time to reconsider my vote. I should get home from work with a couple hours to look things over again and change my vote if I see something more convincing.

 

[RazzleFish]

It's not my job to tell you what to comment on, however, it is rather convenient that the only thing you had to comment on was FF and then he withdrew from the game.

I realize that but IMO it sounded like you had a specific even in mind so I asked. When catching up on the thread, I noticed FF and chose to focus more on him and so my "notes" contained only information from my theory.