id also like to know about this so called "list" you have. is it really just the scum dens list of townies?
Mafia 94: When Gingers Attack; the play
- Thread starter jbradt
- Start date
So at this point, after all the agreeing, disagreeing, agreeing w/disagreeing, disagreeing w/agreeing, disagreeing w/disagreeing ect...my head is pretty much going in circles!
I found the exchange between Lab and Doll a bit odd, I took both of them as joking around at first then I realized no...that was not the case. Lab say's she didn't realize Doll was joking and that may be true everyone takes things different at different times, but to me at least it was pretty obvious. Not vote worthy IMO...but worth watching I believe.
Plant, the who posting over and over that we need to post, adding a post count and everything else on day one...when posting was happening...not sure what I make of it.
Pap, seems to be going from person to person "jumping" on everything.
2H, not sure I like the way he seems to be following others thoughts.
Kash..her vote to Chill when others really hadn't posted much of anything helpful was kinda out of nowhere.
Pir, has said a lot that looks bad..but with him that happens pretty much every game and others reactions to his posts bring more interest to me then his actual posts. Of course his posts warrant questioning, but when someone takes it and runs that is what gets my attention.
Not really sure where my vote is going to go at this point.
I found the exchange between Lab and Doll a bit odd, I took both of them as joking around at first then I realized no...that was not the case. Lab say's she didn't realize Doll was joking and that may be true everyone takes things different at different times, but to me at least it was pretty obvious. Not vote worthy IMO...but worth watching I believe.
Plant, the who posting over and over that we need to post, adding a post count and everything else on day one...when posting was happening...not sure what I make of it.
Pap, seems to be going from person to person "jumping" on everything.
2H, not sure I like the way he seems to be following others thoughts.
Kash..her vote to Chill when others really hadn't posted much of anything helpful was kinda out of nowhere.
Pir, has said a lot that looks bad..but with him that happens pretty much every game and others reactions to his posts bring more interest to me then his actual posts. Of course his posts warrant questioning, but when someone takes it and runs that is what gets my attention.
Not really sure where my vote is going to go at this point.
go// First, glad to see you back G. That's terrible what happened to your mom. It would freak me out big time, too.// go
Yep, seemed to have worked. Said something similar in one of my earlier posts:
Can't be for sure as I skimmed last game but i thought JB admitted to handpicking roles. A lot of mods have admitted to this. I wouldn't recommend clouding the thread with early conjecture but once when I was on a townie pr team with Ice, HN, and Blueiz, we kicked Mafia butt by guessing who RB would have picked.
I agree that you are a good player. Exactly why I expected more from you as I stated in my response to your greeting. But your reaction and for you to even brag about your posts being fluff, makes my scum meter jump pretty high. IMO a townie would want to post more than just fluff as fluff doesn't exactly help innocents distinguish you from Jack. What theory are you speaking of, my red headed friend? Why are you putting words in my mouth? I don't recall stating that my post was a post of my scum list. As I stated I only had time to make one post so I included my questions to others on the same post, questions which shouldn't offend an innocent townie.
So you saw my post as that I was "picking on" Pir? Just asking questions which if you are an innocent you would agree is totally acceptable.
Again what theory are you talking about? Or is this just another post for you to drop my name out there again?
As mentioned yep. I recall you being more helpful and active as a townie as opposed to when you were scum.
Again, I never therorized that Dawg was evil bc he had a low post count. I voted him because as I have mentioned I found his few posts very unhelpful.
Yep, seemed to have worked. Said something similar in one of my earlier posts:
The post count was a visual aid. It helped to prove my point which you missed, as at that point Dawg only had 5 posts, none of them as he admitted were really game related. Night was to be in about 12 hours. It only helps the scum when there's no discussion until hours before Night, then a flurry of hapharzardly placed votes. If he had RL issues, I could overlook it, but he was here and posting "fluff" posts. I expected more from him. Don't you? And what about his scummy reaction to one vote thrown on him and twisting my post into making it look like that was my proclaimed scum list?
LOL, you are voting me bc I say what I mean and mean what I say? I stand by my opinion that low posting only helps the evils to hide.
Except that in your last post which you mentioned me you stated:
This post confuses me a bit 2H...it looks as though you are saying you ARE team mates with her?
Ok, that's great you added more posts...but do you plan on adding any posts with actual content other then your thoughts of being on her list?There...now that should get me off of Plant's list...
Why should it not be a surprise? I really don't see where you have stated any kind of "case" toward her?
im really not likeing the way people are voting and then saying how they might not have time to come back and read responses and such. i mean if it were only 1 person it wouldnt be suspicous but its like 3 people.
I vote to lynch 2H
2H, you came on saying how there could be more then 3 evil (after someone else mentioned it), you questioned Plant even telling her to "re skim" the rules after she said something about 3 PRs, after JB even said the roles are in the rules you still said it is "likely" 3, then followed Kash's thought on Chill not adding your own thoughts, then after Pap votes Plant, you do?
2H, you came on saying how there could be more then 3 evil (after someone else mentioned it), you questioned Plant even telling her to "re skim" the rules after she said something about 3 PRs, after JB even said the roles are in the rules you still said it is "likely" 3, then followed Kash's thought on Chill not adding your own thoughts, then after Pap votes Plant, you do?
the phrasing concerns me Plant "not so randomly" like you want the idea floated out there but you don't want it to look like it came from you. The same with 'I wouldn't recommend" but one time "we kicked mafia butt" by doing it. Are you subtley trying to start something that would cloud the thread?
Dawg why did you say Plant should probably move to G next, when there were others at the bottom of the list?
