Just wondering if you still think anything about this vote count?
So, maybe MC isn't playing the way you remember so much?
Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)
- Thread starter Kashta
- Start date
So, are you leaning her innocent or not? Also, why do you think that Chill is protecting her?
Pappy, D1 when I did my reversal we had the time and the people viewing the thread to ask others different questions. Unfortunately that didn't happen. Instead I spent the next 24 hrs answering the same questions over and over.
Mad as DR in the game you are referring to, I was trying to have the ability to protect the other PR's if I was found by them. Not anything about my gameplay just about preservingt the protection should I figure the right candidate for it. If I remember correctly I did eventually.
It has never been a secret that I have no qualms about being lynched to have the vote records reveal info. This is a team game and the only victory is when your team wins. It doesn't matter if you are still alive at the end if your team loses.
Everyone knows this about me. There it is.
Time is drawing close. I have been looking and as I stated this morning we have players that can be scum and you wouldn't know it by reading their posts.
I have mentioned my concerns with Dawg before. There weren't many because he is one of the best I have seen. Call it a gut feel if you want to but, After reading Dawg's posts, I don't feel like he is really trying to help the town. I see comments on what everyone is focused on which drives me nuts because we already stated and came to a consensus,I thought, that focusing on who MC invested is a waste of time as it is purely conjecture and point of view.
There was his immediate vote for DD that didn't get retracted until JP called him on it. He had said good find Chill over the implication that JP was innocent which opened up the third theory of invest, but was sticking with the he invested DD theory and voting her. It wasn't until JP told him he couldn't have it both ways that he retracted.
This makes me think Dawg is scum. He really hasn't been trying to help the town like he usually does.
I vote to lynch Dawg
Mad as DR in the game you are referring to, I was trying to have the ability to protect the other PR's if I was found by them. Not anything about my gameplay just about preservingt the protection should I figure the right candidate for it. If I remember correctly I did eventually.
It has never been a secret that I have no qualms about being lynched to have the vote records reveal info. This is a team game and the only victory is when your team wins. It doesn't matter if you are still alive at the end if your team loses.
Everyone knows this about me. There it is.
Time is drawing close. I have been looking and as I stated this morning we have players that can be scum and you wouldn't know it by reading their posts.
I have mentioned my concerns with Dawg before. There weren't many because he is one of the best I have seen. Call it a gut feel if you want to but, After reading Dawg's posts, I don't feel like he is really trying to help the town. I see comments on what everyone is focused on which drives me nuts because we already stated and came to a consensus,I thought, that focusing on who MC invested is a waste of time as it is purely conjecture and point of view.
There was his immediate vote for DD that didn't get retracted until JP called him on it. He had said good find Chill over the implication that JP was innocent which opened up the third theory of invest, but was sticking with the he invested DD theory and voting her. It wasn't until JP told him he couldn't have it both ways that he retracted.
This makes me think Dawg is scum. He really hasn't been trying to help the town like he usually does.
I vote to lynch Dawg
UN, it is so unlike you to roll over like this...you should know better than to pull the "woe is me" excuse. I can't help but think how you would react if your good friends FF or Pir pulled something like this
These posts seem very much fake to me.
Was that to me? Obviously what I said earlier doesn't make sense because MC isn't scum. Everyone pretty much voted FF or Spencer for what seemed like legitimate reasons at the time so not much comment there. Chill's wishy-washy vote on DD still has him on my short list.
Day 3 - Vote Count
2 DD - UN (1127) LG (1142) Dawg (1195) Dawg (1452)
4 UN - Zaffy (1147) DD (1167) Rich (1438) JB (1483)
4 LG - Jpappy (1255) User (1282) Lab (1364) Wizard (1365) Mad (1467)
1 Chill - RB (1516)
1 Dawg - Wizard (1535)
No vote: AAF, Ninja, Bally, Chill.
PMs as needed.
Nightfall in two hours.
2 DD - UN (1127) LG (1142) Dawg (1195) Dawg (1452)
4 UN - Zaffy (1147) DD (1167) Rich (1438) JB (1483)
4 LG - Jpappy (1255) User (1282) Lab (1364) Wizard (1365) Mad (1467)
1 Chill - RB (1516)
1 Dawg - Wizard (1535)
No vote: AAF, Ninja, Bally, Chill.
PMs as needed.
Nightfall in two hours.
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
ah... wasn't thinking about that...
G, the boss shows as innocent on day 1... other mafia shows as mafiaDoll, aside from what Pap and Wiz pointed out, even I?F he had got innocent with a invest on night one...it wouldn't mean diddly, since the boss shows as innocent night one...so your thought that if he invested you he would of got innocent doesn't stand as a reason for him to vote you so the mafia would think he was not the detective.
Ok Pap...as long as you really think you know what you are doing and not just being stubborn because you don't want to admit you could be wrong.
[YT]jAlQ1cR6X9Q[/YT]
Chill, going back I came across this post I know you have been questioned about it..but I would like to hear your answer now.
Why did you want to give scum a "reasonable" excuse to move off a innocent?
