Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)

AAF hasn't posted in the thread since 11:58 last night.

He posted these times since then:

6:19 PM
6:12 PM
5:10 PM
4:35 PM
12:22 AM
12:15 AM
12:12 AM

What have you been doing buddy? Has someone been telling you to back off and hide a little?
 
And for the inevitable, oh well posting something similar was one of the things that got FF, an innocent, lynched post:

It's scummy plain and simple. No matter how you put it, disappearing from the thread for this long seems pretty scummy. Not to mention how active he was when we were all BSing on D1.
 
Are you still basing your vote off of MC investigating UN? Even though he couldn't have investigated him according to the timeline you posted with your vote...

And you basically just rephrased what LG told you. Any innocent invest N1 is not conclusive.

except for 1.
 
Doc part makes sense. Thanks. Still doesn't make sense to be willing to be lynched as town, especially realizing that this is a numbers game.



I'll say that Dawg abandoning the "MC/DD investigation" theory, only to bring up MC's vote again, makes it look like he may want to help keep the theory alive in folks' minds for some reason.

Saw this and thought I should respond before leaving.

Mad, it seemed to me after you took your hiatus from mafia that we had a bunch of players that would rather pat themselves on the back for surviving the game than risk themselves to help their team. It was mostly when they were innocents but it drove me nuts. In any other game where votes are spread, and I know you know this, the voting record can lead to scum. So if I am lynched in normal spread votes circumstances, my lynching can reveal something to the sharp townies still in to help them figure out the scum. That has always been my thought and why I do play aggressively.
 
Pappy, D1 when I did my reversal we had the time and the people viewing the thread to ask others different questions. Unfortunately that didn't happen. Instead I spent the next 24 hrs answering the same questions over and over.

Mad as DR in the game you are referring to, I was trying to have the ability to protect the other PR's if I was found by them. Not anything about my gameplay just about preservingt the protection should I figure the right candidate for it. If I remember correctly I did eventually.

It has never been a secret that I have no qualms about being lynched to have the vote records reveal info. This is a team game and the only victory is when your team wins. It doesn't matter if you are still alive at the end if your team loses.

Everyone knows this about me. There it is.

Time is drawing close. I have been looking and as I stated this morning we have players that can be scum and you wouldn't know it by reading their posts.

I have mentioned my concerns with Dawg before. There weren't many because he is one of the best I have seen. Call it a gut feel if you want to but, After reading Dawg's posts, I don't feel like he is really trying to help the town. I see comments on what everyone is focused on which drives me nuts because we already stated and came to a consensus,I thought, that focusing on who MC invested is a waste of time as it is purely conjecture and point of view.

There was his immediate vote for DD that didn't get retracted until JP called him on it. He had said good find Chill over the implication that JP was innocent which opened up the third theory of invest, but was sticking with the he invested DD theory and voting her. It wasn't until JP told him he couldn't have it both ways that he retracted.

This makes me think Dawg is scum. He really hasn't been trying to help the town like he usually does.

I vote to lynch Dawg

Offering yourself as a sacrifice as an innocent does nothing to open up voting records. If people take you seriously it gives them an excuse to vote you and wastes a valuable day finding scum. Innocents shouldn't be afraid to be lynched if they think scum are pushing for them but to preemptively offer yourself up is a completely different scenario.

And let's be honest...people aren't going to make things up to talk about. It's all well and good to try and get discussion going but it was wishful thinking at best to think everyone would back off FF and Spencer's scummyness and find something that wasn't there to begin with.
 
AAF is also online, just not viewing this thread. What the heck, I'll try spreading it out too.

I retract my vote to lynch LG and vote to lynch AAF
 
And for the inevitable, oh well posting something similar was one of the things that got FF, an innocent, lynched post:

It's scummy plain and simple. No matter how you put it, disappearing from the thread for this long seems pretty scummy. Not to mention how active he was when we were all BSing on D1.
Is this in english?
 
Is this a question for me, or a comment?
Yes, it is a question..

Was that to me? Obviously what I said earlier doesn't make sense because MC isn't scum. Everyone pretty much voted FF or Spencer for what seemed like legitimate reasons at the time so not much comment there. Chill's wishy-washy vote on DD still has him on my short list.
Yes Pap, it was to you...MC was innocent yes but does that change your thought completely?
 
And for the inevitable, oh well posting something similar was one of the things that got FF, an innocent, lynched post:

It's scummy plain and simple. No matter how you put it, disappearing from the thread for this long seems pretty scummy. Not to mention how active he was when we were all BSing on D1.

I have no idea what you are trying to say here UN. You seem to have more loose screws than usual this round...

forget it... I get what you guys are saying now... I guess I just wasn't considering that I could be considered Boss...

Again, are you still basing your vote off of MC investigating UN?

except for 1.

No idea what you are talking about UN. Anyone that shows as a plain old innocent on the first invest still has a slim chance of being the boss.
 
AquariaCentral.com