Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)

[user_name]

What are you talking about?

Loose screws. :screwy:

:wall:

 

[user_name]

HUH??

:headshake2: You should be able to figure that out on your own. There's an innocent that he could've proven innocent.

 

[jbradt]

:headshake2: You should be able to figure that out on your own. There's an innocent that he could've proven innocent.

Seriously, dude... WTF are you trying to say?

 

[Lady G]

:headshake2: You should be able to figure that out on your own. There's an innocent that he could've proven innocent.

I guess I'm just not going to get it...have no idea what you mean. If the boss would show as innocent night 1, then any innocent "find" is not conclusive.

 

[user_name]

Vigilante - You may communicate with the detective outside the thread only if they investigate you.

Noods for the invest?

 

[Madcrawdad]

You said MC played that way when he was scum in a game you remember....he was not scum this game, so was he or was he not playing the way you remember?

Paul's random vote here was reminiscent of a random vote he threw in the earlier game I quoted where he was scum. So, yeah...he did that in both games. One he was scum, the other he wasn't. Looks like random votes are now more of an MC-tell than a scumtell.

 

[Lady G]

Vigilante - You may communicate with the detective outside the thread only if they investigate you.

Noods for the invest?

:banhim:

 

[Lady G]

Paul's random vote here was reminiscent of a random vote he threw in the earlier game I quoted where he was scum. So, yeah...he did that in both games. One he was scum, the other he wasn't. Looks like random votes are now more of an MC-tell than a scumtell.

LOL...ok.

 

[user_name]

:banhim:

If you were innocent you would've figured that one out, rather than look for someone to blame the invest on.

 

[jpappy789]

That's not an "innocent" that would be a PR and would show as such...not to mention the Doc is the same way so by your standards that makes 2 not 1.