Mafia 96 Who Are You? Game Thread

there's simply no reason to take a chance when you've only got one shot per policeman/hitman. the chances of investigating someone on your own team every night for 3 consecutive nights is slim to none. these were not calculated risks, these were well placed and thought out shots, and you know it. why are defending ice again? why are you and ice trying to stir up confusion? what is there to gain from it if you're not scum? there will be one more hit if the remaining policeman isn't hit soon. when that hit hits on scum, we'll see.

sorry... it was easier for me that way and not lose my train of thought. if you'd like, i'll re-write the whole thing over with quotes. however, i do think it's easier than when i have to search back several pages to quote something for an answer to someones inquiry, so i didn't see it as a major issue. especially with skimming seemingly so frowned upon in the games.

I disagree that there were no reasons to not chance a well thought out yet not 100% certain shot. I am not defending Ice, nor am I trying to stir up confusion. I happen to agree with Ice and I am leaning him innocent. I think the scum team is trying to eliminate him. They almost succeeded. How is the remaining policeman in any danger? The scum have lost 1 shot and used the other on Dag (still don't understand that one but ok). The only shot remaining is from the last policeman by my calculations. The only way the last policeman can be eliminated now is if the scum manages to get them lynched.

Don't worry about re-writing it all over, just in the future know its easier for people to read quotes. Skimming is not good, but it happens plenty in these games. It will likely happen moreso if people have to click a link to see what you were referring to.

You're the one who said the policeman was in danger of being hit. Please tell me how they are in that danger. You are the one who said it, why are you asking me to explain what you said?
care to retract that statement?

the alternative would be to explain how you're not putting a blatant attempt forth to cause confusion.
 
care to retract that statement?

the alternative would be to explain how you're not putting a blatant attempt forth to cause confusion.
You said "there will be one more hit if the remaining policeman isn't hit soon". Therefore, you were saying the remaining policeman was in the position to be hit. What are they going to do, shoot themselves? You are the one implying the last policeman is in danger. I want to know why you are implying this. Nice try with trying to make me look like I'm contradicting myself. That was a good effort on your part.
 
I only have a minute right now, but I wanted to ask Labby and Ice both a question since they both seem to think I am the Don and invested both Ice and Kash.

So you both really think that only having one person I KNEW to be on my side, I would "team" up with them in a obvious attempt to take out someone...seriously? Why would I do that, wouldn't it make more since for me to stay clear of them to keep all connections away from them?

Then on top of that...I take out the one one person (after the only team mate I was in communication with was hit) that was looking to be thinking the same things I was trying to "put out there"?

On top of that, you (Ice) stated you thought we had Dag taken out in some silly attempt to say "look he was innocent, so am I"...how many invests do you think I as the Don could of had. If I had invested Ice, and Kash...Kash was not the hitman, and was dead by the time Dag was hit, who exactly could I of had take out Dag? I could of only had 2 invest's at that time, and the hit can only happen if I was in communication with the hitman. So Ice...who is the one not thinking clearly here? How in the world could what you say think happened happen?
 
You said "there will be one more hit if the remaining policeman isn't hit soon". Therefore, you were saying the remaining policeman was in the position to be hit. What are they going to do, shoot themselves? You are the one implying the last policeman is in danger. I want to know why you are implying this. Nice try with trying to make me look like I'm contradicting myself. That was a good effort on your part.
oh, jeebus, labby. you're really stretching, here. anyone can be lynched on any night. just because i used the word hit instead of lynched at the end of the sentence in no way convinces me you misunderstood me. your effort is valiant and dually (to say the least) noted.

rich said:
I have to say I do not see what that proves.
i have to ask. are you implying that lab_rat has proven something? very interested in your thoughts.
 
I only have a minute right now, but I wanted to ask Labby and Ice both a question since they both seem to think I am the Don and invested both Ice and Kash.

So you both really think that only having one person I KNEW to be on my side, I would "team" up with them in a obvious attempt to take out someone...seriously? Why would I do that, wouldn't it make more since for me to stay clear of them to keep all connections away from them?

Then on top of that...I take out the one one person (after the only team mate I was in communication with was hit) that was looking to be thinking the same things I was trying to "put out there"?

On top of that, you (Ice) stated you thought we had Dag taken out in some silly attempt to say "look he was innocent, so am I"...how many invests do you think I as the Don could of had. If I had invested Ice, and Kash...Kash was not the hitman, and was dead by the time Dag was hit, who exactly could I of had take out Dag? I could of only had 2 invest's at that time, and the hit can only happen if I was in communication with the hitman. So Ice...who is the one not thinking clearly here? How in the world could what you say think happened happen?
I can't speak for Ice, but I do believe you and Kash would work together in a subtle way to try and get a danger to your team lynched. I can't figure out why you guys shot Dag.

The hit on Dag occurred after you would have had 3 investigations since it fell after night 3.
 
oh, jeebus, labby. you're really stretching, here. anyone can be lynched on any night. just because i used the word hit instead of lynched at the end of the sentence in no way convinces me you misunderstood me. your effort is valiant and dually (to say the least) noted.
Dun, you're the one doing all the stretching. Hit vs. lynch is a big difference. One cannot happen unless the policeman shoots himself, the other is possible.
 
Ice seems to be important to the scum team right now...

Yeah, looks like they want him dead.

dunno about that.

yes ma'am. better to be a vet making a noob mistake than scum trying to play foolery from my point of view. i'd hope you see things from the same pov.

Wow, nice shot! :headbang2: That was a nice surprise before nightfall.

So Dun, tell me, who do you think wants Ice dead? The scum or the innocent townies?

this group of posts has me wondering what you guys are talking about. I lost cable last night for a while so wasn't really able to keep an eye on the game until late. By that time, I was pretty tired eyed to watch. When I started reading today though, I saw these posts and they have me thinking... what are you guys talking about. How do you guys come to the conclusion that the scum(s) want(s) him dead? I am not seeing it.

Right now I can't tell on either of them. I want to think Dag scummy for his closemindedness and how hard he went after Ice for something I didn't see. Looking back, he and Kash seemed to be working together a bit. The only thing that holds me back from calling him scum is how quickly he voted for UN after UN's super scum move.

Rich isn't striking me as scummy. He's difficult to read as always, but I wouldn't vote for him at this point.
you say here that Dag went pretty hard after Ice. I see G going hard after Ice, however both of those thoughts in mind and Dag being killed and innocent, what do you think about G?

Like the time you took when you jumped to the conclusion that Kash was shot by a policeman?


Wiz gave no indication of who took the shot. Tell me JB, how did you know it was a policeman that took the shot and not a poorly placed shot by the other hitman? That's a pretty big conclusion for you to jump to.
is this conclusion as big as the one below?

I'll go ahead and place my vote. I vote to lynch JB. He is scum.
 
I only have a minute right now, but I wanted to ask Labby and Ice both a question since they both seem to think I am the Don and invested both Ice and Kash.

So you both really think that only having one person I KNEW to be on my side, I would "team" up with them in a obvious attempt to take out someone...seriously? Why would I do that, wouldn't it make more since for me to stay clear of them to keep all connections away from them?

Then on top of that...I take out the one one person (after the only team mate I was in communication with was hit) that was looking to be thinking the same things I was trying to "put out there"?

On top of that, you (Ice) stated you thought we had Dag taken out in some silly attempt to say "look he was innocent, so am I"...how many invests do you think I as the Don could of had. If I had invested Ice, and Kash...Kash was not the hitman, and was dead by the time Dag was hit, who exactly could I of had take out Dag? I could of only had 2 invest's at that time, and the hit can only happen if I was in communication with the hitman. So Ice...who is the one not thinking clearly here? How in the world could what you say think happened happen?

I admit i am wrong on the scenario, my head was still fuzzy from all the drinking the night before. 3 invests wouldn't get you a hitman,kash and knowing me and dag were innocent.

Doesn't mean you're not scum, just means I might be wrong about you being the Don. Since Dag showed innocent though,which I suspected, I will need to think about my vote.
 
AquariaCentral.com