If you did the full mod, specifically the full trimming of the sponge and most important the use of Poly-Blanket wrap I would say absolutely more then enough filtration for tanks up to 150. Let me reiterate my position on this with a post I made on another forum.
Quote: "The only reason I first had cut groves in top sponge was becasue I was experimenting but the next day had the epiphany that in order to take advantage of the filters full circumference potential, both top white and bottom block sponges had to be trimmed evenly away 2 inches from the sides of the canister inside walls just like the FX5 (sigh) from the top white sponge to all but the bottom 1 inch of the black sponge. The bottom 1 inch acting as a bushing to keep the sponge centered and provide a bypass-prevention seal to make sure water does not sneak past in a short cut to the pump, clearly indicated in the photo's I posted showing the white ring at the bottom of the poly-blanket rapped sponge (sigh). In addition the whole purpose of a circumference filter witch is 6 times the surface area of the stock configuration is to allow fine polishing media (the poly blanket) to wrap and seal the sponge becasue with so much surface area you are able to have all the benefits of fine polishing with long endurance and high water volume throughput, all while while increasing bacteria colony surface area by at least 5 times due the the poly-blanket micro surface-area which is far more then the sponge alone (sigh). This method is an all win (polishing)-all win (endurance)-and all win (bio-filtration) situation. Again his is the way "ALL" world-wide industry "circumference filters" work, the finest media on the outer orbit followed by successively courser media toward the center or bottom where the pump or intake is located. To NOT wrap the sponge in poly-blanket as clearly shown in my pictorial is counter productive, akin to placing high performance rims on a car with no tires (sigh). From the prospective of knowing and understanding circumference design that is a pretty accurate analogy (sigh).
"
Quote: "The only reason I first had cut groves in top sponge was becasue I was experimenting but the next day had the epiphany that in order to take advantage of the filters full circumference potential, both top white and bottom block sponges had to be trimmed evenly away 2 inches from the sides of the canister inside walls just like the FX5 (sigh) from the top white sponge to all but the bottom 1 inch of the black sponge. The bottom 1 inch acting as a bushing to keep the sponge centered and provide a bypass-prevention seal to make sure water does not sneak past in a short cut to the pump, clearly indicated in the photo's I posted showing the white ring at the bottom of the poly-blanket rapped sponge (sigh). In addition the whole purpose of a circumference filter witch is 6 times the surface area of the stock configuration is to allow fine polishing media (the poly blanket) to wrap and seal the sponge becasue with so much surface area you are able to have all the benefits of fine polishing with long endurance and high water volume throughput, all while while increasing bacteria colony surface area by at least 5 times due the the poly-blanket micro surface-area which is far more then the sponge alone (sigh). This method is an all win (polishing)-all win (endurance)-and all win (bio-filtration) situation. Again his is the way "ALL" world-wide industry "circumference filters" work, the finest media on the outer orbit followed by successively courser media toward the center or bottom where the pump or intake is located. To NOT wrap the sponge in poly-blanket as clearly shown in my pictorial is counter productive, akin to placing high performance rims on a car with no tires (sigh). From the prospective of knowing and understanding circumference design that is a pretty accurate analogy (sigh).
