If you test without an ammonia source (fish) your readings shouldn't change much. If anything I'd put the TSS in the tank then add the straight ammonia, see if the ammonia level drops down fast. If it does that stuff might just be pure awesome.
I still think testing with pure ammonia is better. But if you use fish, monitor params.If you test without an ammonia source (fish) your readings shouldn't change much. If anything I'd put the TSS in the tank then add the straight ammonia, see if the ammonia level drops down fast. If it does that stuff might just be pure awesome.
:rofl:you guys are hilarious, me and Tina are reading the debates here and rofling.
JPappy is right in what he was trying to say. Ammonia is ammonia and the bottle of stuff does not know the difference. If it won't process bottled ammonia, it won't process what the fish produce either. Where you end up if you don't test and make sure things are OK is you either get lucky and your fish live or you don't and your fish die. Before all these test kits became available and the concept of fishless cycling was invented, we all killed lots of fish trying to establish new tanks. With our improved knowledge, there is really no excuse for those high fish death rates any longer. Nobody here can force you to cycle the tank in a particular way but refusing to test because you are afraid the snake oil will not work is ludicrous. That is exactly what it sounds like Tetra wants you to do which is my first red flag about their product. If I had read instructions not to check how well a product is doing its job, my first reaction would have been to leave the stuff on the fish store shelf and find another way to cycle my tank.