Until you cite a paper that is a study between nitrifying bacteria products, or one that proves Stability (and other bacterial products) doesn't work, it's all beside the point.
If I am wrong, explain this to me:
I put ammonia and an airstone in a jug with water (regular fishless cycle, smaller scale)
After X amount ammonia, an Y amount of time I have enough bacteria to treat an estimated Z amount of gallons.
How does this patent prevent me/any company from selling those bottled nitrifying bacteria, or stop them from working.
Serious question. Answer it yourself, not by saying just read the '238 research papers'.
Cause the only way I see it is you have to deny the fishless cycle works, or that everyone that did not use the Tetra product doesn't have "the right" bacteria in their tank.
If I am wrong, explain this to me:
I put ammonia and an airstone in a jug with water (regular fishless cycle, smaller scale)
After X amount ammonia, an Y amount of time I have enough bacteria to treat an estimated Z amount of gallons.
How does this patent prevent me/any company from selling those bottled nitrifying bacteria, or stop them from working.
Serious question. Answer it yourself, not by saying just read the '238 research papers'.
Cause the only way I see it is you have to deny the fishless cycle works, or that everyone that did not use the Tetra product doesn't have "the right" bacteria in their tank.
Last edited: