Tests for a Walstad

captmicha

Le tired.
Dec 6, 2006
2,052
0
36
39
Maryland, USA
I'm going to convert all my tanks into planted tanks via the Diana Walstad method. With real soil.

Is it important that I get a CO2 test? And do I really need a nitrate test if I test for ammonia and nitrites? If I monitor those two, and keep those levels in check, do I really have to worry about testing for nitrate?

And can some one recommend a calcium test kit for freshwater? Thanks.
 
she moderates the el natural section over at apc. why not ask her yourself?
 
she moderates the el natural section over at apc. why not ask her yourself?

Maybe I will but this question can be answered by anyone who understand water chemistry better than I do.

I wonder how it feels to be in Wikipedia... And have a method named after you...
 
I'm going to convert all my tanks into planted tanks via the Diana Walstad method. With real soil.

Is it important that I get a CO2 test? And do I really need a nitrate test if I test for ammonia and nitrites? If I monitor those two, and keep those levels in check, do I really have to worry about testing for nitrate?

And can some one recommend a calcium test kit for freshwater? Thanks.

Some folks mineralize the soil first, some use worm castings, some use ADA aqua soil. They are all somewhat similar methods. They all have the same basic ferts in them and they all last years and years, and only decline with respect to NH4........NO3 is highly mobile and comes from a good well fed fish load ideally.

The goal is really low input and sustainability.
So if you are the impatient type, most have troubles with this method.
But.........the success rate is pretty high with this method vs others.

Just things grow slower.

No water changes, no real dosing etc.........no testing needed etc.
I decided to test an idea some years ago and did the water column dosing method using non CO2, no water changes and no soil/rich sediment, just plain sand. Works just the same, but you need to dose 2-3x a month once a week or so.

So you can go either way or use both, a but a rich sediment is easier I think if you set it up that way from the start.

You can also take soil and add some water to make "mud". Put mud into ice cube trays, and add these "mud cubes" to re- enrich sections.
Some have used osmocoat in place od soils etc as well.

Main tenants; no water changes, no CO2.........good balanced fish load, algae eaters, pack the tank with easy to grow plants from the start.

Regards,
Tom Barr
 
I'm a little confused, why would plants grow slower?

I'm going to provide additional filtration, such as a HOB or canister or something, so I don't have to stock the tank so sparsely with livestock. I'll also probably dose with Seachem Flourish or some other fertilizer.

I know that's not "adhering to the method" but I feel it'd be better that way. I mean, most bodies of water that fish live in have their water replaced multiple times a day and fertilizers applied by nature.
 
plants grow slower because of less light, no co2 other than what your tank can produce, and it's also only nutrients come from food, poo, urine and decaying material (but you'll be adding more ferts anyway)
 
I have 4 NPT and doing what you are thinking. 3 wpg lighting. HOB filter and dose with flourish and and iron every 2 weeks. My plants are going crazy! I can grow just about any plant with great color. In this hobby sometimes you have to investigate then do your own thing. Every tank is different. I do a 25% waterchange about every 6 weeks on 1 tank due to heavy bioload. The other 3 have only added evaporated water for the past year. All readings remain great.
 
AquariaCentral.com