THE PLAY: Mafia #16 'Till death do we part...

Thanks. I guess my concerns about you are similar to those on Ice, although he seems to be somewhat back to normal. You have yet to really make a stand of any kind. In that post you named what 6 people and said "But please take that with a large grain of salt". I see no commitment to your own ideas. Just going with the flow. I'll probably be hit or lynched for saying this, but I feel it's better to be wrong for the right reasons, than to glide by for the wrong.

I made a stand 7 posts ago from yours...
 
Here's one for you Jpap...this song cracks me up like crazy, my girls and I sing it all the time!!

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/flash/play/733/
LOL, Lady. Luv'd the song.

Aiii this is too much to read and follow :/

I had a gut feeling on Tuesday, something about Jo struck me as a little suspicious, but I couldn't pinpoint it and I didn't want to try to catch anything on him. So I didn't mention it (I don't think I did?)
I remember you saying you thought someone was suspicious but it wasn't me, though you kept your vote on me. I believe you were talking to Jpappy at the time and said you had to wait until that person posted again to tell. So now you're saying that person was Jo? A bit convenient now, but I would still like to hear why you think he is suspicious in your own words.

if you must know why i'm not on much is


1. i go to sleep for about seven hours

2. i go to school for about 6 and a half hours(plus homework for an hour)

3. and finally i share this computer with the family(which includes my brother spending 3 hours a day on it and saying that it's still not enough)



you'd hear alot more from me on the weekends when i'm not as busy...
RL (real life) does take away from my game time as well, especially w/my kids both being sick, but when you get caught up reading, I would like to hear who you suspect. It doesn't have to be a long list, just one or two will do and please state the reason(s) why you suspect them. I like to give people, especially new players the benefit of the doubt, but I really don't want it to come back and bite me in the but.
 
Your "stand" lists 3 people and no vote. Forgive me for missing it...


My stand is listing who I have issues with, post 650 tells you about my voting as I already answered Ice about my Liz voting....skimming, Hook..?
 
make that posts 648 and 650 about the voting
 
My stand is listing who I have issues with, post 650 tells you about my voting as I already answered Ice about my Liz voting....skimming, Hook..?

Nope. I've read every word you've posted, it's not difficult since you haven't been posting much until some focus was placed on you. You may have "explained" your reasons for voting Liz, but you've dodged the actual point entirely. You've not provided much input for the town, but yet seem to want to guide it with your "Generic comment".
 
No wheels needed Blue, I've gone digital.

I've got nothing solid to point out, but your posts are quite different than last game and much closer to those of your first. What were you in that game again?

I have to get this out there, I do think Blue is posting more like her first game. No one thought anything of it when I brought it up in that game, really there is no one thing that stands out to post on, but it is more a "feel" of her post...if that makes sense to anyone.

I know we don't want to jump all over the newbs but I'm sorry guy's Kuhli is not sitting right with me, Liz had me going back and forth on my thoughts of her...first I thought oh newb mistakes, then I thought for sure mafia, then I thought maybe she figured the game out well and was trying, in her own kinda way to help, I'm not sure I think she is mafia and of them I would pick Kuhli over Liz at this point. Atnixon, really I have no feeling on him one way or the other and wouldn't of mentioned him but figured since I was talking about the newbs I needed to include my thought on him also. Really there is no reason they wouldn't be "randomly" picked.

Jo and Ice have me concerned big time, and really I don't think they are both mafia..but I can't decide which I feel is.

Right now I would have to say my main concerns are:

Chaz
Ice
Jo
Blue
Kuhli

Anyones thoughts on them? I would also like to point out that I to like the picking between 2-3 players and discussing them. I was gone at that point last game and when you guy's did that I thought it was great.
 
Nope. I've read every word you've posted, it's not difficult since you haven't been posting much until some focus was placed on you. You may have "explained" your reasons for voting Liz, but you've dodged the actual point entirely. You've not provided much input for the town, but yet seem to want to guide it with your "Generic comment".
A generic comment would not guide the town, hooked. Can i see your qualifications as the defining authority on how much "input" is required?

Is it enough input to tunnel vision all arguements between 1 or 2 players on one or two others?

Where are your abonimations to the other 8-9 people that are not participating at all...?

First you question that I haven't taken a stand...and I show you I have.

Then you question my voting...and I show you the posts about that.

Then you question the amount and quality of my posts.

Keep digging the hole hooked.

I suggest you go back and make a list of all posts from all players for the game, and more specifically just since night one ended before you claim the quantity of posts don't equal your demend.

You, and others have commented in past games that the quanity is indicative of anything.

Your opinion of their worth is dependent on your worth to the town.
 
I agree with the need to watch close, especially if they don't post at all and come in with a quick "I agree with what others have said" post, and poop a vote.

Kind of a Kuhli/Deputy type style of participation.

I will do my best to at least post a vote for discussion before heading out to work at 5 AM...and get caught up as quickly as I can when I get home.

I still recommend to all that the review the posts from day one, with the knowledge of night ones results. Also go back to my post on the differences of judge's lists and fill in the word innocent by the appropriate players and whatever status you are, as a continuing exercise.
I think you could add Blue to that also (the I agree with what others say and vote)
 
A generic comment would not guide the town, hooked. Can i see your qualifications as the defining authority on how much "input" is required?

Is it enough input to tunnel vision all arguements between 1 or 2 players on one or two others?

Where are your abonimations to the other 8-9 people that are not participating at all...?

First you question that I haven't taken a stand...and I show you I have.

Then you question my voting...and I show you the posts about that.

Then you question the amount and quality of my posts.

Keep digging the hole hooked.

I suggest you go back and make a list of all posts from all players for the game, and more specifically just since night one ended before you claim the quantity of posts don't equal your demend.

You, and others have commented in past games that the quanity is indicative of anything.

Your opinion of their worth is dependent on your worth to the town.

Keep digging a hole? Okay...

I suggest you quit making suggestions and try to play the game rather than speaking as a Mod. You assume that I don't have a spreadsheet with a tab for everybody which contains every post and vote they've made...

Alot of people will not question you because your name is in red, I'm not one of them.
I am taking the liberty to assume that by "You, and others have commented in past games that the quanity is indicative of anything" you really meant "You, and others have commented in past games that the quanity isn't indicative of anything".

Gotta hate details huh?

.
 
AquariaCentral.com