THE PLAY: Mafia #16 'Till death do we part...

[IceH2O]

16 hours to go

I thought night fall was at

Night fall will be Fri nov the 16th @ 8pm est

your 16 hrs to go post was around midnight that would be 4 PM.

As it stands right now its about 13 hours till night fall.

 

[Blueiz]

So, I have defended DD, an innocent. I have voted for Liz, as several others have, I have voted for Jo, as several others are as well for the same reason I am. This makes me mafia? If that is the case, then everyone that voted for Liz and for Jo need to be looked at as being mafia, and all those that voted for DD and pushed to have her lynched are to be looked at as innocent.


I retract my vote on Jo

 

[IceH2O]

I don't have enough time this morning to pull the posts but I was thinking about this last night in bed.

Jo and LG seem to have a lot of the same thoughts, even as far as Jo is able to say I was about to post the same exact thing.

I wish I had the time to go through and pull them all but what I'm getting out is that its possible they are spouses.

Judges post about when spouses are tied together had the words USED and RECEIVED both past tense words in it. We know she has already messed up the hit, is it possible that the mafia put in their PMs for partners and she hooked them up the 1st day?

Something to think about today at work I guess but its just strange how their ideas go hand in hand to the point that Jo doesn't even have to post them.

 

[IceH2O]

So, I have defended DD, an innocent. I have voted for Liz, as several others have, I have voted for Jo, as several others are as well for the same reason I am. This makes me mafia? If that is the case, then everyone that voted for Liz and for Jo need to be looked at as being mafia, and all those that voted for DD and pushed to have her lynched are to be looked at as innocent.


I retract my vote on Jo

huh???

I thought this was a sarcastic post till the vote pull.

Why all of a sudden do you think Jo is innocent?

 

[IceH2O]

I'm going to end up late for work trying to figure this one out.

I don't get it at all.

What are you trying to say Blue? Reading the post it looks as if you're being condescending but then the vote pull looks like you're being serious. Which is it?

 

[plantling]

Also wanted to mention Brains has note posted except his/her first post..which IMO was a strange one to start the game with, although it did make me laugh and maybe was it's purpose.

Brains post made me laugh, too. The tone was funny plus I found the post a bit ambiguous.

This is the only post from Brains so far:

Looks around wondering why these people are so worried one way or another of my innocents. I haven't done any thing honest.

As is, it appears they're trying to say they have not been honest. But hopefully they just forgot a comma.

Looks around wondering why these people are so worried one way or another of my innocents. I haven't done any thing, honest.

With the comma, they're saying that honestly they haven't done anything (to make us so worried about their innocence.)

It's reminiscent of meem's and her left out comma last game that confused King. But whether or not Brains is meem's, I still think Judge wouldn't have given us a Mafia to replace an innocent. It would only complicate things for her to have to switch a Mafia to an innocent also.

Psssssst, Brains you should only try to confuse us if you're Mafia. :lipssealedsmilie:

 

[Reefscape]

You completely twisted the context of one of DDs statements by removing the comma , and obviously thinking you were infalable for making mistakes in wording. I see this, expecially the removing the comma, going out of your way to find things to have DD lynched.

It makes me step back and wonder why you were so focused on DD that you ignored what others said regarding her possibly being innocent. You didnt step back and rethink your accusations even after the points you made were given a valid rebuttle.



If you didnt think she was more mafia than anyone else either, then why didnt you focus on the others that had also made what could be classified as "slips"? Especially after there were several, including myself, that were in aggreeance that dd made an honest mistake.

I fully agree with Charlies statement " feel Jo pushed the hardest to lynch DD"

I agree with everyone that states that they feel Jo pushed the hardest to lynch DD.

What makes this suspicious?

As I said, my mistake, however, I still stand by the pushing for DD's lynch while not taking a step back to read what others were saying and think that he could indeed be mistaken.

Is it just a coincidence that you two state that you arent defending each other?

Read again, I said MY mistake in a previous post concerning this and stated what my mistake was. Take that or leave it, as you will.


You are pointing out a mistake that I have readily said was MY MISTAKE. I got you and Jo mixed up, it was pointed out, and I admitted and accepted that I was wrong. This is exactly what happened with DD, she made a mistake and was persecuted for making it and owning up to it.


My vote still stands on Jo for the reason I voted for him, because of how hard he pushed to have DD lynched, however you are starting to look just as mafia to me as he does.




Was the above quote suppose to be an answer to my question

It doesnt answer why you and Jo are stating you arent defending each other.

I would like to hear more why you have switched your vote away from Jo..Looking at the above quotes, you seemed to be pretty heavy on him and how he pushed to have DD lynched..and now your pulling your vote away from him?

Are we starting to see a mafia partnership here?

 

[charlie_stubbs]

weirdness.

Blue explain why you haved pulled your vote from joe?? Is it because you now find him less suspicious then when you placed the vote???

Truth is, this game is getting more difficult to play. Call me a follower. I am suspicious of Lady G and Joe mostly, because they pushed hard for the DD lynch.

 

[charlie_stubbs]

Ok, this is driving me nuts. Everyone keeps pointing to low-posters as automatic guilty ones. I was going to write a post this morning but the site was down and had to go to work, I went to work and chose to hang out with some friends tonight so I'm finally getting to some ideas now. Last game I was in the people who accused the most were the highest posters in the game (Clown-lover and Swayde). Now I'm going to start targeting high posters as guilty because I'm beginning to believe that in this game those who talk a lot are doing so to cover something. It seems to happen game after game with highly experienced players and the strategy could be working more so with those who have modded before and get to observe what things go completely unnoticed. Everyone pegs the high posters as helpful but often they are the ones most guilty at turning the game in their direction, so for now I'm going to combine this theory with the person I see as most acting under this method.

I vote to lynch Joander.

Making one long post every couple of days is a bad strategy. I would like to see you try to post this all again tonight after a few refreshments. Now that would be funny.
What you're saying here is suspicious to me my hairy friend. Time to get my weasel kicking boots on.

 

[charlie_stubbs]

If i were mafium, i would chose a newb as my partner. Why you ask??? Because the vets are usually willing to focus on other vets, and newbs fall into a grey area. A seasoned vet could easily guide a newb to continue to stay in this grey area. This strategy could last for days. Also, its unlikely the detective would investigate a newb.