Consider this. Crayfish. Crayfish were illegally introduced into AZ streams and lakes and now they have taken over. They basically strip waterways of all vegetation and wipe out fish spawns.. They were introduced as bait..Seems pretty silly to be legally able to kill and eat a non-dangerous fish but not keep it as a pet wouldn't you all agree? I know here in PA once a fish is legally taken (proper licensing, seasons and bag limits, size etc.) as long as you don't try to sell it the state doesn't care what you do with it.
Consider this. Crayfish. Crayfish were illegally introduced into AZ streams and lakes and now they have taken over. They basically strip waterways of all vegetation and wipe out fish spawns.. They were introduced as bait..
My point is that generally when one is done "keeping it" they generally drop it in the first body of water they find because they can not simply toss "Spike" in the dumpster..Apples and oranges! I'm talking about catching and keeping as a pet a native fish which is supposed to be where it is when I catch it. Any law which prohibits this assumes that I will re-introduce the animal. I would expect a state whose motto is "Live Free or Die" wouldn't be so eager to ignore a concept as basic as "innocent until proven guilty". Oh well things will get better there.