Zen4t5 said:
The WPG rule doesn't apply to 10 gallon tanks. You actually need more WPG than other tanks. I don't really know the scientific reason. Maybe someone else can explain it.
I personally think that's a myth. At least in my experience it is.
I remember reading this in-depth article all about it too; this guy went on and on with all of these mathematical figures meant to show how the light dissipates and diffuses or what not. Had me thinking I was going to need like 8wpg to grow water sprite.
Very much proven wrong. Water sprite grew well, as did rotala under only 2wpg. And in my 2.5g betta tanks I have had cabomba, water sprite and rotala thrive in 4wpg. This is not even considering the crypts and java fern that were more than happy.
This article also claimed that you can get by with far fewer wpg in larger tanks, as it relates to the ratio in the smaller tanks by the opposite way. Yet in my 55, which receives 2.9wpg cabomba disintegrates and dwarf hairgrass died within weeks. Only hornwort and swords survive in that tank. (I haven't added crypts or java fern because it's an Amazon blackwater tank.) Though I'm pretty sure I'm very much limited to shady plants if I plan to have any of them planted in the substrate. I hope I never have to clean up mountains of cabomba corpse again.
Anyway, I don't care if someone wants to respond with flames. I stand by my assertion - watts per gallon is watts per gallon. It doesn't change its effectiveness due to the volume of a tank. Also, light intensity plays a big role. But that's another subject.
However, I am very much of the believe that the height of a tank makes an immense difference...and that is most likely why I lost my cabomba and hairgrass - the height of the 55g tank. Again, light intensity probably plays a factor. But I'll shut up now.
I leave it at this - a ten gallon tank with anything between 2.5 and 5wpg is a well equipped tank as far as lighting goes.