OK good some thoughts and twitches out there
OK, Coler's in super paranoid mode, but he's also most probably a zombie or soon to become one. I'd almost rather just lynch him and have him gone than working for the zombies.
Absolutely not in super paranoid mode at all. Your response however, noted
Come on...you would take me out by a lynch based on 'I'd rather not take a chance??'...this is awful logic, based on the fact that there are sooooooo many good players in this game. I pretty much anticipated some talk like this and decided I would view the person coming out with it as suspicious in my mind - I presently read this as an effort to distract, with a side-hope of actually starting something against me. I also think I would make a poor zombie turn because for whatever reason, I always get investigated early on so would be revealed quickly - they would prefer to lynch me.
I am perfectly happy, being a normal, to say to the town that if you feel safer with me gone, lynch me tonight. This is effectively what Ogre is saying - of course, I can assure you, it would be a mistake, I am one of the good guys.
edit : please take a close look at the logic Ogre is offering here, in the context of how many good & experienced players there are in this game. It's nonsense. I am not super-mafiadude at all, my record is pretty miserable in many ways.
Coler, this post concerns me....
By suggesting that the sheriff even consider 'steering' the town's lynch on days 1 or 2, it almost looks like you're fishing for the sheriff.
Playing out in the open, by trying to guide the town, could leave the sheriff open to a zombie kill (or even worse, turn). Keep in mind that although you say that the sheriff is currently 'weak,' the sheriff would prove a very valuable addition to the zombie team.
Mad makes a fair point - please read 'steer', which was a poor choice of word, as meaning I don't know...don't vote for them & campaign for their innocence (this won't arise until earliest tomorrow anyway). I absolutely agree that in this set-up an outed sherriff is an absolute disaster unless he/she has a list of zombies to work through.
If you want to start looking at out of place things the very 1st posts are mysterious to me.
Why would Charlie post darn innocent again when he knows in the past we considered that a screw up? Could it be that he has played so often we know he knows and that we'd think it was a joke? Does it automatically make us think he is innocent?
Then Coler does the same thing basically. 1st post is about how he is innocent but assumes he'll be turned. Why even put it into our heads that you're innocent?
Then the last post about the Sheriff worries me a little bit too.
See above re post about sheriff - I agree it was badly put.
Asserting my innocence ? meh - as I say above back to Ogre, its wrapped within a joke. There's no need to be worried, unless you're a zombie.
