Too bad about Ace...
I like the dimensions of the 75 too... I like the shorter and wider tanks.
I like the dimensions of the 75 too... I like the shorter and wider tanks.
Benson?s 40 B Build
- Thread starter Benson
- Start date
I mean... besides having more fish both tanks are 4 ft tanks... what other fish could I keep that would warrant the 90???
Personally, as far as I'm concerned a 90g is an overpriced 75g. Same footprint but costs more and potentially has higher lighting requirements (probably doesn't apply here though).
If you want to keep fish and corals that use a lot of vertical space I could see it maybe being useful but beyond that the extra gallons are just numbers. They don't really change what the tank can truly support.
If you want to keep fish and corals that use a lot of vertical space I could see it maybe being useful but beyond that the extra gallons are just numbers. They don't really change what the tank can truly support.
You could get a 110, which is 31" tall...lol. Although you would have to get out your snorkel if you drop something on the bottom. I would do the 90, if choosing between the two, i guess just because its bigger, and would make for a neater display i think. If anything a 5 or 6 foot tank would be better 
I like the 75 myself but, the bigger the tank the more options for stocking.
Yes the Tide rolls on. So many people at work said Bama shouldn't have been in the game last night. I think having #1 and 2 playing for the championship sounds right.
Yes the Tide rolls on. So many people at work said Bama shouldn't have been in the game last night. I think having #1 and 2 playing for the championship sounds right.
I'd go with the 90 because it's taller and tall tanks just look better. Plus, more space to put corals, and more depth to have a variety of them.
I guess I'll go with a reef ready 90. Going to have to do some updating... skimmer, lights, sump. I'm wil also have to add more rock. Going to be a fun project!
