The only reason I'm ticked off is because Harry pulled a thread of mine which was basically only receiving posts btw me and another member. His basis for doing so was completely unfounded and assinine ,IMO, and here's his explanation:
"Yes, that was me. I'm sorry, but there were just too many problems with that thread. On the one hand, you put together a completely incompatible set of fish and apparently killed a great Chocolate female from stress, and on the other hand Lady Trish was going on about her failed hybridization experiment that she seems to be determined to repeat regardless of the mess she will be making for her fellow hobbyists.
Leaving the thread untouched would have sent a completely wrong message to any new hobbyists that happened to come across it, and I just didn't feel like rehashing those arguments in public, especially since it would have come across as a public reprimand to all concerned."
Why does it have to be a public reprimand. Educate people, tell them what is responsible, and was is completely irresponsible, and if they continue to act in an ill-manner, like many already do, oh well at least you educated some people and cut down on future incidences like these. I just wish if he was going to police this board he would actually take time to verify what he read, not glance through a post, totally misconstrue it, and then continue to tear it down without any warning because he deemed a mix of fish "incompatible", or did not wish for people to be allowed to speak of hybridization, or because he 100% falsely stated/believed that I killed one of my fish. This is completely false, unless she floats with her fins and gills moving, and somehow posthumously learned to eat. Although my fish mix may be unorthodox, there are certainly no more problems than any 'ol similar tank. So, I think what we have here is a third party getting overly-involved when they shouldnt have. I'm sorry but more of moderating and less of Lord-ing.
I agree with Liv2 on many points in his statement, and agree that we do as hobbyists have a responsibility. However, Liv2 and other aquaria purists on this board, is it really that big a sin to just see what happens to the fry should breding just happen? I mean from what gathered, lady trish was simply witnessing that her GT and oscar were pairing up, and was going to allow it to happen. Is it that big a NO-NO that someone do this, or are you more concerned with these fry being released into the public. Because though I def see where you are coming from, I do not think it is wrong for someone to do this and maybe keep a couple/ give a couple to learned friends who are totally aware of what they are, and plan on raising them as they would a "natural" fish, providing there aren't too many visible health complications that would deter the fish from having a happy life. And if Harry was trying to avoid a convo like this, why?????? Aren't you trying to educate the people on these boards?? And if I offended anyone I am sorry.