What you know? I pretty much dismissed Lympho as possibility with the fact that my experiences with Lympho didnt actually came and go on by itself. Upon pulling out old textbook and some of my old notations, I realized I never gave my fish to fully develop lesions for them to rupture and
release lymphocystis cells. Ive always removed such lesion upon discovering. Although some lesion has returned to same area and even on new areas, I always
removed lesions followed by topical application of many different ointments/antiseptics, etc, etc. This is what I meant as part of going further with the lesions or similar...
I am
darned as this actually maybe common Lymphocystis & thanx to this thread & SD, who seems to resolved the issue on his/her own, I again learned never to prematurally determine/dismiss based on what I thought I knew/remembered well!!!!
A very good reason why one should never claim he/she is good which I read from time to time thru forums. In real life, one with qualification never have to claim such as their actions will deliver and always leave room for unknown since there are so many unknowns
.
Although leaning toward Lympho, still shouldnt disregard other possibilities such as Sarcomass, etc, etc.
According to my textbook, morbidity of Lympho is low even among most susceptible species but that does not necessarily mean it wont spread to other fishes with all the replicated Lympho cells released, especially fish with open wound. Final decision is yours.
There are many research datas avail on net so take your time choosing and reading to be used as references/guidances.
http://aquarticles.com/articles/management/Lawler_Lymphocystis.html
Good Luck with Beastie! Hopefuilly lesson well learned, not just by me but others as well!