Mafia 37 (35?) 50/50

[Chill]

I have one problem with you here.... The split was already dictated by the Mod as 6-6 + 1 Bomber. The SB could play either side and are basically just a wildcard IMO. Why are you confused about this? This is the exact SAME thing that put Dawg on the radar for me. I think I need to review your posts.... care for a pact?

Okay if this is not distancing why is Dawg still on your list but G doesn't make it?

Ok... I see decent cases right now for voting for Chill, Scoop, Dawg, and maybe even NJ. We need to come to a consensus of sorts IMO. My top choice is Chill, but I may change to one of those listed. I'll stand by that. Waiting to vote or voice opinion is doing us no good. Speak up and vote.

My lists of suspects for the communicating Mafia is Hook, G, and NJ. G's interaction with Hook and NJ has changed. Last game they all played together G and Hook, and G and NJ were at each others throats. This game there is no hostility and NJ even makes a weak attempt at defending G and Hook. My vote remains on G but I believe Hook is her partner.

 

[Chill]

I've highlighted NJ's defense of G below. It may be nothing, but considering their bickering last time they played together it certainly seems out of character.

I agree that Dawg's sort of negative and jumpy right now. Personally I would have thought Ogre was strategizing pretty good, he always does, but when I think something is an innocent play, lately it's pointed out to me that it's more than likely a setup meant to make us think down a certain path. I was believing it though, and until I see anything otherwise, I am definitely keeping DD on my list of the usual suspects. I thought the way she came charging out at me grasping at straws is very mafia, the kind of mafia that you'd expect over holiday weekend, the easiest pick on slim choices. (WHich is what you usually have the first day.)

If Ogre is lying, can DD be telling the truth?
If DD is lying, does that mean that Ogre is telling the truth?

Personally I don't understand some of the votes at the moment, specifically at Lady G or HN. They seem pretty weak, almost like habitual voting. I have to agree, I think anyone assuming that someone would tell me to play, no less Lady G (sorry lol), is a little crazy. I haven't had the best track record (ever actually) of going along with the pack. I dislike it immensely. Anyway, no one's ever told me what to do during a game ingame, and it would most likely stay that way. Just the idea makes me look strongly at a vote. What am I, easily manipulated? *JK* Also it was said that while I SAID my postcount would be low, I had "one of the highest post counts to date." SEriously? I think I posted like 4 times. In my mafia games, anything under 10 per day is a light day for me. Another total inaccuracy which I suspect was placed to undermine credit in what I say, and mislead others.

My vote stands for now, with DD in close second, and possibly Ogre if it appears this was some well orchestrated debate.

 

[Chill]

I'm watching that too, but anyone throwing my name (or varied aliases) out there repeatedly deserves my attention. I'll be ready to vote for G if Chill ends up mafia... I see alot of very subtle distancing there. I'm not at all sure about you, but I don't like my name brought up that much. It gives the scum something to grasp onto and in turn blame you for it. Assuming you're innocent, you'd want to avoid that.

That's pretty funny. I've voted for G and you'll vote for her if I'm mafia. By that logic if I'm innocent she must be innocent huh? Now that's what I call subtle distancing. Lynch me and clear your partner in one deft statement -pretty slick.
No if G turns out mafia them we should be looking at you next.

 

[dirtydawg10]

So you want to tell me what was so odd...I mean all I said was you are funny for saying that I was telling someone what to do. You took that and tried to make it into something huge...saying I was freaking out (no not exact wording)...but to me that was very odd.

Actually Hooked and I have "gotten along" in a few games, him and I have only been team mates once I think. So really it depends on the game itself as to what happens between us. The last time we were at each others throats so badly...well, we were both innocents. I go back and forth between Hooked and Huggie Oh don't forget HN...I call him that too, all the time...just one of those things. Why you so obsessed with Him and I anyway? You gotta thing for one of us:lipssealedsmilie:

I didn't say NJ was No where near my radar...I said I see nothing from her at this point...big difference there. As far as Ogre appearing to "protect" her, really that is one of the reasons I have her leaning more innocent. I believe he may of been trying to "attach" himself to an innocent. If you read through so many games...you should of seen that too, the bad guys "seeming" to protect someone who is innocent, you see then if/when they are lynched they have someone to fall back on to try and look good.

Well, as for you....you did post odd IMO, which was also the same thing you tried to turn into something. Plain as that, no BIG difference there, the "odd" post you tried to "turn into" something

LG, how is this even possible. We're talking night 1 here. Ogre had no Idea who was innocent. There was no investigation at that point. If Ogre was communicating mafia he only knew 3 mafia (himself & 2 others). If Ogre was non-communicating he only knew himself. Ogre at the time he was protecting NJ had no votes on himself and she only had a few joke votes which were all retracted except for one. I can't see the mafia taking an innocent under his wing theory.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

Okay if this is not distancing why is Dawg still on your list but G doesn't make it?



My lists of suspects for the communicating Mafia is Hook, G, and NJ. G's interaction with Hook and NJ has changed. Last game they all played together G and Hook, and G and NJ were at each others throats. This game there is no hostility and NJ even makes a weak attempt at defending G and Hook. My vote remains on G but I believe Hook is her partner.

Maybe you have 2 of 3 right. I don't know. I'm not distancing at all, nor do I have anyone or any reason to. You're basing all of this on there not being any hostility? Great case... You should look back on past games beyond 2 or 3 ago.

That's pretty funny. I've voted for G and you'll vote for her if I'm mafia. By that logic if I'm innocent she must be innocent huh? Now that's what I call subtle distancing. Lynch me and clear your partner in one deft statement -pretty slick.
No if G turns out mafia them we should be looking at you next.

Good job, you voted for her with no threat that she'd be lynched. Mafia would never vote on one of their own right? Not to mention that half of them don't know the other half. I think you're mafia and I'm voting it. Have you voted yet or did you decide to not wait until right before night? Do you actually want to lynch someone tonight or will you try to blend in quietly again?

 

[Chill]

Maybe you have 2 of 3 right. I don't know. I'm not distancing at all, nor do I have anyone or any reason to. You're basing all of this on there not being any hostility? Great case... You should look back on past games beyond 2 or 3 ago.



Good job, you voted for her with no threat that she'd be lynched. Mafia would never vote on one of their own right? Not to mention that half of them don't know the other half. I think you're mafia and I'm voting it. Have you voted yet or did you decide to not wait until right before night? Do you actually want to lynch someone tonight or will you try to blend in quietly again?

Okay you think I'm mafia, you're watching me for slip ups, you claim to see me subtley distancing from G, yet you didn't see the vote. Is this where I'm supposed to accuse you of skimming? I believe you know full well I voted and this is just more misdirection on your part.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

Okay you think I'm mafia, you're watching me for slip ups, you claim to see me subtley distancing from G, yet you didn't see the vote. Is this where I'm supposed to accuse you of skimming? I believe you know full well I voted and this is just more misdirection on your part.

No, it wasn't misdirection. I was pointing out your change. Yesterday you waited until right before night to vote because you admittedly didn't want your vote to matter. Now, a day later, you are claiming to have the entire communicating evil team pegged. Got any more vague accusations or insinuations you can make against me? Please try to be creative.

 

[Chill]

Nothing vague here I'm saying you and G are communicating mafia.

You could have pointed out any 'change' in my behaviour without asking if I have voted when you know the answer to your own question.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

Nothing vague here I'm saying you and G are communicating mafia.

You could have pointed out any 'change' in my behaviour without asking if I have voted when you know the answer to your own question.

Yep, I could have. You also could put an actual case together instead of basing your suspicions about me solely on the fact that I've not been hostile enough for you.

 

[[AC] scoop411]

I didn't say NJ was No where near my radar...I said I see nothing from her at this point...big difference there. As far as Ogre appearing to "protect" her, really that is one of the reasons I have her leaning more innocent. I believe he may of been trying to "attach" himself to an innocent. If you read through so many games...you should of seen that too, the bad guys "seeming" to protect someone who is innocent, you see then if/when they are lynched they have someone to fall back on to try and look good.

Big problem with this theory here. There are/were 6 and 6 innocent and mafia. Only 3 and 3 know who they and their teammates are and thats it. SO how would ogre possably know Neon Julie was innocent and not a lone or communicating mafia. See nowhere in the rules do I remember it saying that the Non comms got to know who the comms were. So by that deduction how do you know NJ is or isn't innocent G. Oh wait I think I have an idea on that question... So is that WHO your team investagated in nightfall.

LG, how is this even possible. We're talking night 1 here. Ogre had no Idea who was innocent. There was no investigation at that point. If Ogre was communicating mafia he only knew 3 mafia (himself & 2 others). If Ogre was non-communicating he only knew himself. Ogre at the time he was protecting NJ had no votes on himself and she only had a few joke votes which were all retracted except for one. I can't see the mafia taking an innocent under his wing theory.

Dawg I'm glad to see that I am not the only person who noticed this issue. Now the only problem is IMO what if we are wrong and G and NJ are comm Innocents and thats how she knows that NJ is innocent. THIS is the ONLY reason my vote isnt in yet for G. I didn't catch on to it till late last night and now I can't quite get that outta my mind as a very real possability.

So Dawg what is your thought on this one?

Anyone else feel free to comment as well.