Mafia 81: The Bloody Coup

[Piranha86]

Hey all D1 is kind of a bunchof BSing, but I found a few quotes below.
And seriously guys, don't ride my...back about not posting a lot. I'm not allowed on the computer and I'm home alone 2:45-4, so that's when the majority of my weekday posting will be. During the weekend, it depends. I'll probably be on in like 3 hour sprees.

for his own enjoyment.... more hoping then leaning, leaning sounds kinda serious

Not quite sure why you would hope that... ?

Not a whole lot going on except that I see FF is speculating about who the President is. Even though it is in a hypothetical conversation it doesn't seem like something an innocent would or should be doing.

For now...I vote to lynch FF

I'll agree that initially you weren't going to play, but it was three, or four days ago that you decided. That's plenty of time to remember that the last time the teams were evenly split, not to mention that (as I recall) you were the last scum standing.
Yet you claim that you don't remember your team starting out with four players.
Then you say that you didn't look at the sign up rules, but you think Ice changed them.

Not buying it Pap !

That's one heck of an accusation. I mean, the game was like 3 years ago, and JPap has played quite a few. I've played like 5 and I can't even remember them all very well. You're distancing or something, very scummy.

 

[Piranha86]

For the DirtyDawg quote, I was backspacing some other stuff and accidentally got rid of that, sorry.
QUOTE=dirtydawg10;2487300]Not a whole lot going on except that I see FF is speculating about who the President is. Even though it is in a hypothetical conversation it doesn't seem like something an innocent would or should be doing.

For now...I vote to lynch FF

(It just comes so natural to me to type that)[/QUOTE]

Dawg, I understand being suspicious, but voting for him? That seems a little much this early.

 

[Piranha86]

Pretty likely to change, but I vote to lynch TwoHobbies.

99% chance I'll change that or at least find another 2H slip, but that's just for my paranoia of UD.

I've got to go write an exhilarating 2 pages of American Government homework. See you guys later

 

[rich311k]

Pretty likely to change, but I vote to lynch TwoHobbies.

99% chance I'll change that or at least find another 2H slip, but that's just for my paranoia of UD.

I've got to go write an exhilarating 2 pages of American Government homework. See you guys later

Wow you pick on Dawg for a thin argument and come up with this.

 

[Kashta]

Kashta, I made that remark as I was biting my tongue on posting RL details into the game. Apparently it is an annoying habit that I have so I am trying very hard to keep my RL details out of the game; not really seeing how it indicates my role in this game, especially since I have less then a handful of posts thus far.

Red Part: No. See Noods, that's my point for mentioning it. You didn't make it just some general remark while biting your tongue, etc. etc. That would've been a general statement you might have put out there, not directed to anyone specific.

Instead, you directed that remark at me. That's why I think there was something behind this.

You also would not have addressed this to me at all except in reference to the ghost hunter game. (That's where I gave you a hard time about posts like that. And, yes, you were evil and I was innocent.)

Had I given you (or anyone else) grief over posting RL excuses to explain away being absent/low profile in this game? No. People do that all the time. Others did that too last game (both innocents and evils) and several others were already doing it again here. So I didn't somehow draw the connection for you to the previous game. You came up with that on your own.

Blue Part: Now..... I mentioned wondering why your thought process went like that. And you answered by saying it wasn't anything but RL details are annoying to people? Okay, well, sure they are. But Noods, you actually did not address anything to do with why you brought up my name. What that leaves me with is a non-answer from you about this.... which is interesting.

Had I not stumbled onto something... telling..... I expected you'd write it off as a joke. I believe an innocent Noods would have done that... simply shrugged it off as being funny on Day 1. I even gave you that possibility as an "out" in the post I made. So now I'm starting to believe an evil Noods really was feeling antsy or jittery about being evil again AND posting RL reasons which takes you away from the thread again AND there must have been some nagging thought in mind that someone..... LIKE KASHTA..... might possibly think you're scummy.

That's why you made that comment to me.

I vote to lynch Noodles.

I have no idea whether or not this vote will stand or if I'll to decide to change it before nightfall.

 

[Lady G]

while i was reading this, i was thinking: What does this have to do with mafia?

So, when you get back, what does it have to do with mafia? Seems to be a wast of time to me.

GTG, BBL

Had nothing to do with the game...why would you think it did?
Same as pizza toppings and football teams had nothing to do with anything, same as your living situation...how far your dad lives from your mom or Ninja mom from his dad or any of that.

So was there a point to that question?

 

[Lady G]

English isn't my strong suit...one reason I'm not at a Lib Arts college.



Three-four days of things other than AC and mafia for the most part

I plan on the rules that are posted in the GAME THREAD being final unless the mod changes them within the GAME THREAD. Ice hasn't clarified what the split actually is...so at this point it is all speculation. Ice certainly changed what he posted then compared to what is posted here. I never said that I checked it before the game started. I read the rules as posted. Once this topic came up I double checked as people said he wrote that it would be 50/50 rebels and innocent in the sign up. That is different than what is in the rules here, hence he changed them. My point is that he may very well have dropped that stipulation from the list because of the odd number of players and didn't want to spell out the split or for some other unknown reason. I do think he would have mentioned something but no one even asked Ice to clarify (unless I missed it) before throwing out names of people who didn't see the split in the sign up.

Again, I do not remember last game being an even split per se only that there were at least three of us. Two on a team isn't very common unless it is D1 of a team building game. Mods tend to follow that pretty evenly over the course of the games. Never once did I explicitly state that there were not four of us. You're putting words into my mouth.

And that was how many games ago? I cannot keep track of every game and how many evils there were. Not exactly something that sticks out in my mind anyways compared to being evil and dieing last. I did not check #9 and I even said that. I do not exactly have time every game to drudge up old formats. I answered the question best I could remember at the time.

Have to say I don't really keep track of game after game, what I was each game, how many were evil, what the exact rules were from game to game either. I also look to the game itself (the one actually playing at the time) as to what the rules will be. Just because something is mentioned in the sign up or set up threads, unless they are in the game itself...really I don't think about it.
Although, I have to say something you said in here caught my attention Pap....you said "Never once did I explicitly state that there were not four of us" the word "US" at the end of that sentence just isn't looking to good to me.

 

[jpappy789]

I tend to not read THAT far into things...my only concern Kash is that you shrug off the fact that Noods wouldn't do that when innocent. Can an innocent not poke fun at another player during the beginning of D1? I don't see how she is trying to throw you off without jumping to the conclusion itself. I just see a quick one liner when there was some conversation earlier about RL excuses...then pizza...then football.

To me it doesn't look like the remark was in anyway directed at you personally. The joke involved you, yes, but that is different.

 

[jpappy789]

Have to say I don't really keep track of game after game, what I was each game, how many were evil, what the exact rules were from game to game either. I also look to the game itself (the one actually playing at the time) as to what the rules will be. Just because something is mentioned in the sign up or set up threads, unless they are in the game itself...really I don't think about it.
Although, I have to say something you said in here caught my attention Pap....you said "Never once did I explicitly state that there were not four of us" the word "US" at the end of that sentence just isn't looking to good to me.

That is in reference to the last bloody coup game when I was actually scum (CIA). 2H said that I said there weren't four of us (CIA) in that game when all I said was I remember there being at least 3.

 

[Lady G]

It stood out to me because she directed the comment to me. I would obviously notice it more than someone else reading the same post since my name was mentioned when others weren't.

I understood why Noods repeated that as a quip last game after I backed off from voting her. She was evil at the time... just pretending to be innocent... and it was an effective way to "laugh off" any lingering suspicion about her I may have stirred up in the minds of other players.

For Noods to now carry this over again to another game made me think she'd do something just like that if she's evil. But she probably wouldn't have even thought of it if she's innocent. If anything, it's an indication of her mindset when evil vs. innocent. And Nood's game does change slightly based on what role she has.

Ok, I can see your point...but would note it more as something to watch not really as "scummy" at this point, simply because she usually does state "silly" stuff and I've seen her do it (carry over from other games) as many players do.

I didn't see it as sarcasm at all...I saw it as a hypothetical conversation between you and a scum teammate.


It was the only thing I saw at the time I voted that even remotely made sense for a vote. With that said FF doesn't need any help "going all ranty and crazy." He's pretty good at it all on his own. It was an attempt to get this game moving to actual game play rather than pizza topping discussions. So I threw a vote out to get people talking about it. We do have to lynch someone tomorrow so we need to get some more substance. Not to mention FF still needs to be reminded when he screws up. He still quite often forgets to think before he types. If he is an innocent typing without thinking doesn't help the Town. If he is scum he should continue to type without thinking.

I do agree with Kash's comments about a scum possibly missing on the numbers of scum in the game to try and throw people off their trail. It is a good observation IMO.