I had already asked you not to refer to it as "pain stimuli" as it doesnt cause pain. Its the chemicals emitted in the brain that your aware of when you feel pain.
Your attempting to change the argument with a poor appeal to peoples morals or values. This is not a debate of morals or values, this is actually not even a debate. Technically to be a debate both sides need to have proficient evidence and understanding of their case. That isnt whats going on here.
There is an obvious prejudice where people will refuse to accept that some animals are not conciously aware or cant feel pain. There is no indication that fish do feel pain. Attempting to change the emphasis of the debate by explaning how you, personally, dont know if infants feel pain does not support your argument. Your attempt to argue that we can not communicate with them means we dont know is certainly not true. We do indeed know if the cerebral hemispheres of a human are destroyed, a comatose, vegetative state results. Your attempt at arguing that we dont know what dolphins feel is neither contributory nor meaningful to either side in this debate.
So, your only actual argument is that we should assume something feels something. Thats a fairly poor argument at best, and I believe history has taught us not to assume. This is quite similar to everyone believing the world is flat, or that T-Rex was a hunter. Both prejudice's people have based on nothing more than individual reactions or ideas, not based on scientific or other factual evidence.
Your attempting to change the argument with a poor appeal to peoples morals or values. This is not a debate of morals or values, this is actually not even a debate. Technically to be a debate both sides need to have proficient evidence and understanding of their case. That isnt whats going on here.
There is an obvious prejudice where people will refuse to accept that some animals are not conciously aware or cant feel pain. There is no indication that fish do feel pain. Attempting to change the emphasis of the debate by explaning how you, personally, dont know if infants feel pain does not support your argument. Your attempt to argue that we can not communicate with them means we dont know is certainly not true. We do indeed know if the cerebral hemispheres of a human are destroyed, a comatose, vegetative state results. Your attempt at arguing that we dont know what dolphins feel is neither contributory nor meaningful to either side in this debate.
So, your only actual argument is that we should assume something feels something. Thats a fairly poor argument at best, and I believe history has taught us not to assume. This is quite similar to everyone believing the world is flat, or that T-Rex was a hunter. Both prejudice's people have based on nothing more than individual reactions or ideas, not based on scientific or other factual evidence.
Last edited: