Mafia 100-The Witches Return-The Game

There are currently 3 players (scoop, rickets, Uhoh) who have yet to post since before last nightfall and if I'm not mistaken all of their last posts were thier D1 joke/random votes.

Then there's also Gun who hasn't said anything since nightfall except they hate UDs.

Why all the hiding?
 
[AC] wing nut;2750766 said:
You sure do offer up explanations for players a lot. Are you a latcher?

I posted my thoughts on a oddity. Other explanations also possible.

What the heck is a latcher?
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2750765 said:
Doom, I will try this again. If you were in my shoes, what would have you done? Who would have you switched your vote to? Why?
Do I need to spell it out for you?

I've already said that never said I wouldn't...perhaps it's the double negative that is confusing you but I'm pretty sure that means I would have made the switch too. I'm not sure why you are quoting the posts you are either, it pretty much says in my question to HH that I understand why you switched.
 
[AC] xx_Nemesis_xx;2750269 said:
You are skimming, stupid or scum.




Ahuh.



Well, the first two were said to be random or put up as a joke, from memory. That and the fact that it seems ridiculous on Day 1 to jump a third vote onto anyone with nothing real to go on. I don't know if Driver8, who hasn't contributed anything really, isn't a scumbag who was not in a position to get back in the game before nightfall and so stuck their vote on somebody with a couple of other people on first.

*sigh* I did swear to myself I would keep a decent low profile in this game.

He was actually quite right you never said that the 3rd vote on Tree was scummy until after you switched your vote. Also, why would you pretend that you didn't know who you 'randomly' voted for? You took the time to link to her profile but when you were called on it it somehow slipped your mind?
 
[AC] narwhal;2750762 said:
I did not notice, seems to me it means he did not pay all that much attention when he typed it, came back later and saw that it was incorrect and changed it. I generally go back to my last post when reading that way I do not miss anything.

Thanks for the explanation Wing nut. oh wait what?
 
[AC] C-note;2750777 said:
Thanks for the explanation Wing nut. oh wait what?

It was asked if anyone found it odd? Not directed to anyone and I put my thoughts out on it. Where my thoughts not good enough for you? I too would like to hear other thoughts on it. I thought that is how we played this game.
 
[AC] Doomsday998;2750748 said:
First off, take a deep breath and settle down a bit.

Second, I never once said that I wouldn't do what you did. As an innocent (assuming you are innocent) it statistically makes the most sense to save yourself. I pretty much implied that TWICE when I told HH that given the votes it makes sense why you changed to tie it up. In case you missed that it was posts #210 and 216. The only hesitation I have is that it still doesn't mean you are, in fact, innocent and if not you helped kill a known innocent.

What I didn't understand is why you chose Driver. When you answered that you made no mention of saving yourself, so I asked. I would have thought that would have been the primary motivation.

As for the Pepto bismol joke, maybe you just need to lighten up. Right now you seem awfully jumpy. I don't have any great suspects although if I had to choose right now I probably would pick between you and HH, simply because hardly anyone else is even posting. The other that posting are have not seemed suspicious enough yet.

I still don't see the case on Wiz, especially from the standpoint of your vote yesterday. I could see a slim possibility of those that voted you trying to direct attention away from Wiz, but at the same time the way the situation played out I don't see that as likely. At least not to the extent that HH is suggesting.

So because we are active that is scummy? Is that really what you mean? I am sure I just mis-understood. Could you explain what really seems scummy? I am sure it is more than being active. Is it my weak reason for voting on Wiz on Day one? Now that makes some sense. It really is not that much, but it is what I put out there. I am sharing my thoughts with the rest of the players. Instead of posting about how dead it is, which 24 hours into day two is an embaressment, I have posted my thoughts and answered questions directed to me. Please give more detials when you say you want to burn someone. And no, I will not lighten up.
 
[AC] Doomsday998;2750775 said:
Do I need to spell it out for you?

I've already said that never said I wouldn't...perhaps it's the double negative that is confusing you but I'm pretty sure that means I would have made the switch too. I'm not sure why you are quoting the posts you are either, it pretty much says in my question to HH that I understand why you switched.

Who would have you switched to? What player? Who would have you been tied up with? Yes, spell it out to me.
 
G/o I just spent 4 hours in urgent care with mu 9 month old, after getting up at 3:30with the 3 year old and her fever. Everybody is fine, I'm just beat. I read the thread at the des, but am beyond processing info at this point. When is nightfall? I'd like to put together a coherent post once I catch my breath. G /o

*G/o*
Hope you get some rest Fire, sick babies make for very tired Mommy's!!
*G/O*
 
Kids in bed I can go reread now but this post needs to be addressed first.

[AC] C-note;2750776 said:
He was actually quite right you never said that the 3rd vote on Tree was scummy until after you switched your vote. Also, why would you pretend that you didn't know who you 'randomly' voted for? You took the time to link to her profile but when you were called on it it somehow slipped your mind?

[AC] Doomsday998;2750240 said:
Is there any reason other than just the fact that it is the 3rd vote?

Actually Cnote you are wrong again. Dooms post above shows a post then the vote post in which Nemesis said it was scummy. Just under it Malestrom quotes Nemesis posts that shows it also. Malestrom voted Nemesis for it but I didn't understand his reasoning as it wasn't inline with the posts.
 
AquariaCentral.com