Mafia 100-The Witches Return-The Game

[AC] Tree_Hugger;2750985 said:
Wiz, when you come up a witch, I fully expect to be a top suspect. Someone has already posted about latching. By following Hammers vote on you, I have put myself in a no win situation. It would have been much smarter for me to lay low. I almost got burned on day one. Instead, I have done my best to be active. I have already come to conclusion that your burning is best for the town. One day it might be best for the town to burn me, when that day comes, I will understand. I do not believe that this is that day. As long as I am burned after you, I will be at peace. As far as being a noob, if there was an alias [AC] Wiz, I would think it was being used by a noob. Many players have made comments about your game play. So your vote is on me because I have not said if I had played before? It has nothing to do with my vote on you yesterday, my comments made about you yesterday, my vote on you today or my comments about you made today? I sense a little OMGUS. Also, how is the truck? Remember the truck. Give us an update on the truck. We derseve to know if the truck is done or if this will be used later as an excuse of why you are unable to post anymore. Tell us about the truck.

I really hate to agree with someone that obnoxious but I do think that the Wiz is scum.


I vote to burn Wiz at the stake.
 
Vote count:

Wizard-(4)- Hammerhead, Tree, Star, IQ

Tree-(1)- Wizard
 
[AC] narwhal;2750990 said:
I really hate to agree with someone that obnoxious but I do think that the Wiz is scum.


I vote to burn Wiz at the stake.

Vote count:

Wizard-(5)- Hammerhead, Tree, Star, IQ, Narwhal

Tree-(1)- Wizard
 
Folks, lets not make personal attacks please!
 
[AC] narwhal;2750990 said:
I really hate to agree with someone that obnoxious but I do think that the Wiz is scum.


I vote to burn Wiz at the stake.

Folks, lets not make personal attacks please!

I didn't take this as a personal attack, if it is what you are posting about. I think there is a disclaimer about not taking things personal. I have also not meant to personally attack the wizard or doomsday. In reading my posts, I could see how they could be taken that way. At this point, I take being called obnoxious as a compliment.
 
Ah jeez.

I meant to quote a post I made at 296 but I think I wrote over it instead. I will repeat here.

In post 287 Wizard puts up that Tree is too valuable to lead the charge on him, so Hammerhead does it instead.

This is nonsense.

If Tree is too valuable to the witches to lead the charge, he was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too valuable to leave in a tie on Day 1.

Its about the weakest defence or theory Wizard could have come up with.
 
[AC] narwhal;2750990 said:
I really hate to agree with someone that obnoxious but I do think that the Wiz is scum.


I vote to burn Wiz at the stake.
The timing of this is interesting to me. Nar, why is it that you waited until just after Wiz came on and posted to cast your vote? One theory goes that you "wanted to see what he would say"... another school of thought is that you were waiting for him to come into the scum den and say "it's okay, you guys pretty much have to vote for me".

ATM, my suspect list (after Wiz-bq) is Wing, Nar, Doom and Tree in that order.
 
This was part of my original post 296 which I wrote over - I must have hit edit and wrote in the box rather than reply with quote :-

"
Post 287 not quoted in full

Wizard.

Wizard Wizard Wizard.

I read post 283 and it confused me quite a bit.

The Hammerhead fellow/gal jumps out and says he is 100% sure, as a certainty, that you are scum, and moreover, the head klucky of the kaven.

You are however voting for Tree.

I know I know I know, your theory is that Tree was too valuable to get up front and center with the zippo."

The post ended with me saying that this theory is bunkum because Tree was left in a tie for the lynch. Then I realised that I had typed I read number 283, not 287.

I meant to quote my own post in a new reply, delete everything except 'I read post number 283 and it confused me quite a bit' and put my correction - the post that appears at 296.
 
AquariaCentral.com