Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

[Dangerdoll]

Dun said it was the AAF and FF show, not "day"

 

[allaboutfish]

makes me nervous when it becomes the AAF & FF show. this can't be good for the town...

 

[dundadundun]

Eh... I didn't know it had become FF day... sheesh, there was what, one post directed towards me and a few thoughts of my own? How does that constitute as 'FF day'? AAF day I could understand... but I've barely done anything yet this game... hell, I even thought I was doing pretty well, tbh...

not necessarily focusing on the day. just noticed there's been suspicion aimed your way due to you doing well and posting low.

i've been caught up in that before myself.

 

[Fishfriend1]

Show, Day.... Day Show.... meh, you understood what I was saying right?

 

[Lab_Rat]

I said I actually would have changed my vote if zaf had the majority but that he didn't so I left it. That was right around the time I said I didn't want a first round lunch of a possible innocent on my hands.

When I read this I had the same thought that Wiz posted:

He was in the lead at one point, and even a tie could get someone lynched with an unfortunate coin toss. Had it been a tie and Zaffy lost the coin toss, if he flipped innocent, wouldn't you still have blood on your hands?

To Neph, Lab Rat, JB, Rich, and Zaffy:

For crying out loud, folks. Do you really think we ought to give the addicts pointers and the benefit of our analysis about who they should turn next vs. whomever else they might target?

:hypnotized:

Do you seriously think with this player list it is likely the dealers need any help deciding who to turn? I agree with Chill in that any lists early on in the game may later be useful.

I thought that was clear. Everyone was voting randomly and Zaf made a big deal out of Rich voting randomly. Claiming it wasn't random at all. Zaffy's vote wasn't random it was for a reason. I got the feeling that Zaffy's reason was an attempt to make something out of nothing. Zaffy being Zaffy though it's hard to tell. I might have been wrong (of course we won't know that till we know Zaffy's alignment). At this point if I have to place a placeholder vote it will still be Zaffy till something better comes along.

I got the feeling it was Zaffy being Zaffy, but the way he was talking about defensiveness later towards nightfall makes me look at him funny. Of course I don't trust him as far as I could throw him.

Well, for now, I'm going to place a placeholder vote on Rich, because I still don't really understand how Post can become Vote when using the standard keyboard like the one my dell laptop has.

I vote to lynch Rich

Vote subject to change (as always).

You don't see how someone can mean to type one word and accidentally type something else that was on their mind?

Personally, I'm not so worried about scum looking at lists because they're going to do what they think is best for their team...but that's why I think the lists are a dead end. Even if one of those people flip scum there are enough people in this game to create a list of innocents. Should we lynch our way through that list in case they maybe put a teammate on there? I could possibly be something to consider if it comes down to choosing between two players and one is more turn-worthy than the other.

By naming those people as your suspects you are creating a bias in your thinking, and if those people all happen to be innocent then you are hurting the town.

Let me get this straight...you think we shouldn't have lists? Tell me how not having lists helps the town.

where did i say i didnt read the thread? i personally thought it was too early to tell if kash or pir were innocent or scum. ive seen kash do that kind of kicking the bush before and i havent played many games with pir so i dont know his normal game play.


how would me saying that my vote was from eenie meanie minie mow derail the thread? if that were true wouldnt any other vote that was random derail the thread?

Your posts and actions certainly seem like you are not reading the thread or paying attention.

 

[allaboutfish]

When I read this I had the same thought that Wiz posted:




Do you seriously think with this player list it is likely the dealers need any help deciding who to turn? I agree with Chill in that any lists early on in the game may later be useful.


I got the feeling it was Zaffy being Zaffy, but the way he was talking about defensiveness later towards nightfall makes me look at him funny. Of course I don't trust him as far as I could throw him.


You don't see how someone can mean to type one word and accidentally type something else that was on their mind?


Let me get this straight...you think we shouldn't have lists? Tell me how not having lists helps the town.


Your posts and actions certainly seem like you are not reading the thread or paying attention.

i do have a lot of stuff on my mind but i am reading the thread.

 

[Lab_Rat]

Read for comprehension and you will keep yourself out of trouble easier.

 

[the wizard]

He was in the lead at one point, and even a tie could get someone lynched with an unfortunate coin toss. Had it been a tie and Zaffy lost the coin toss, if he flipped innocent, wouldn't you still have blood on your hands?

I posted this last night and it would appear that Neph didn't want to respond. Why is that?

I am beginning to think that maybe there might have been a slip.

 

[allaboutfish]

Read for comprehension and you will keep yourself out of trouble easier.

ill go through it again tomorrow.

 

[Lab_Rat]

I posted this last night and it would appear that Neph didn't want to respond. Why is that?

I am beginning to think that maybe there might have been a slip.

It very well may have been. I have to place my vote tonight since I am closing on a house/horse farm tomorrow and will likely be quite distracted with that. At this point, Neph is likely to get my vote.