Good news.
SWAT should have had 4 investigations by now, and unless their investigations are of dead people, they should have some info... even if it's innocent reads that can clear some folks.
Also good news in that to have a team, you need to have more than 1...so, there's more than 1 SWAT member still in play.
As mentioned by LG, assuming that SWAT has good info, one of the agents might consider coming forward (if not today, in the near future). If the Doc hasn't been turned, the open SWAT member should be protected, right? If the SWAT member, for some reason, isn't protected by the Doc, we can assume that the Doc has been turned, and that leaves a pretty clear trail to someone...
Also, SWAT members and Doc... if it looks like you're going to be lynched at any point, claim your role. It doesn't do the town any good to find out afterwards that they've lynched one of the PRs. Don't panic at two votes and spill the beans (as to your role). If it looks like your a goner, though, say something...
I agree, we need all the help we can get. Having players we can take off the list will help narrow down the possibilities.
Yes...and if you read the top (below), it says that there was a chance you wouldn't be home before night, which means you were content to ride that vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're wrong, Ice. The case I made against JPap isn't weak at all... there's the possility that it may not be correct, but the case isn't weak...big difference.
On Day 1, Jpap brought up, and considered the use of a 'no lynch' vote. Normally I'm against a 'no lynch', but in this game (with the bomb transfer aspect) it could make sense. JPap saying so on Day 1, kind of had me leaning him slightly innocent at that point, as it sounded like good townie talk, and something that the terrorists wouldn't be urging, as it did have the potential to hurt their game.
On Night 3 (or 4?) when he came out against not lynching, it made me wonder what had changed. The fact that somebody was turned on Night 1 could explain his revised thoughts on the issue.
Weak might not be the best wording but its all I had while in the rush to get to work on time.
I see what you mean and agree.
The thing that throws me though is your insistence to use my 1st day vote against me. It only stood for 9 posts before I switched to Chill for his 17 comment. I would think there is a lot more you could try to use against me. The fact that you would use the 1st day vote against me looks like you are again trying to take the focus off Cap.You seem to be filled with a lot of half truths this game.
I'm having a hard time deciding who I'd vote for as you and Jpap would make great turns and both have done things that seem to deserve votes.
Hopefully one of the SWAT members will come out and clear up the confusion.