Mafia #64 ? Cabin Fever - The Play
- Thread starter jpappy789
- Start date
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
well our current arguments dont matter because there is a train on LR. 5 people, nearest runner up (me or tex) has 3 i think. then Zaffy has 1 right? or did that move?
No, she just goes down below tex.
This is why:
I hate U for this tex, i went through half the thread to find this... on page 13!
First post, no reason why.
Scummy thing to say, even for a newb. That or really stupid in which case he wont be much of a loss if he get banished.
Completely ignored my question...
I vote to banish FF!
Your postings have become too directed at someone who has barely even posted (although given tex's posts are ridiculously suspicious) to warrant stopping the defense of yourself when so many accusations have been thrown your way. It looks like you're trying to find a scapegoat for your actions and tex has presented the possible scapegoat you need.
Your postings have become too directed at someone who has barely even posted (although given tex's posts are ridiculously suspicious) to warrant stopping the defense of yourself when so many accusations have been thrown your way. It looks like you're trying to find a scapegoat for your actions and tex has presented the possible scapegoat you need.
That is why I'm voting Lab over FF.
FF has proven to be spastic and is still new to the game. (Doesn't mean he is innocent)
Lab on the other hand has proven to be good at the game. The fact that she is using Tex as a distraction on top of her innocence pleads helps me think my vote is in the right place.
Riddle me this Dag. Since Lab is doing the same, what pulled you to FF over Lab?
Hey guys! So after reading the thread, a lot has happened. I am not sure I like the way voting is going. I don't like landslides on day one. Dispite that, I want to put my vote on either Tex or Lab, but like I said, I don't like huge landslides so..... I vote to banish Tex! Lab, depending on what happens tonight and into tomorrow, my vote may land on you next.
Sorry, I haven't been around much. The work week is crazy, but I am not! My dishwasher broke unexpectedly so I have to deal with that but I will post as much as I can from here on out.
Sorry, I haven't been around much. The work week is crazy, but I am not! My dishwasher broke unexpectedly so I have to deal with that but I will post as much as I can from here on out.
I'm on and off a bit today. Will try to post what I can, but it's getting late with nightfall approaching.
I made a quick pass through to update my vote tally... correct me if you notice something wrong.
4 FF - JL Rich DD Dag
5 Lab - Kash Wiz Tex Dawg Ice
1 Ice - Zaffy
4 Tex - FF Lab Annie Razz
As Zaffy has been defending/protecting Lab Rat so much, I expect we'll see him retract off Ice and vote either FF or Tex. Even a 50-50 chance is better for them than Lab's certain banishment if Zaffy and she are connected.
I made a quick pass through to update my vote tally... correct me if you notice something wrong.
4 FF - JL Rich DD Dag
5 Lab - Kash Wiz Tex Dawg Ice
1 Ice - Zaffy
4 Tex - FF Lab Annie Razz
As Zaffy has been defending/protecting Lab Rat so much, I expect we'll see him retract off Ice and vote either FF or Tex. Even a 50-50 chance is better for them than Lab's certain banishment if Zaffy and she are connected.
Am I that blind that I'm not seeing things? Where are all these trains and landslides everyone keeps talking about?
It was 5-4-3 before your vote.
Why Tex over the other 2?
Annie is playing a very low profile game this round. He's made a grand total of 5 posts.
Makes quick vote and disappears... as I pointed out in the following post when I questioned him about that.
So Annie appears to be busy. I accepted that and waited to see what he'd post after having his supper and catching up.
Okay... Annie found 4 posts to question. Not much else to contribute after that, except...
This is very interesting.
Where's the contradiction in Lab Rat's playing style as an evil, Annie? The two games where I've seen her as evil before... are not the least bit consistent with each other.
Example 1 -- In the Gunslinger game, Lab didn't know anyone she was up against and she had you, Zaffy, and TRS (fellow evils) to communicate with. Lab did an awesome job in that game staying low keyed and her posts were simple and to the point. But she played her noob card to the max in that game... not letting on how experienced she was playing mafia elsewhere. Lab Rat made exceptional use of that noob card and most of the rest of us fell for that, giving Lab Rat an enormous benefit of doubt. Her game strategy and tactics were very good.... mainly because the rest of us didn't know her yet. And her evil team won that game. However,.....
Example 2 -- Lab Rat got to play communicating evil again in the last game (aligned with the mob boss vs. mayor). In a similarly evil communicating role, Lab Rat's playing style was not consistent with her previous game whatsoever. In fact, her style was totally different. Her posts were very scummy... to the point where the innocent team could see right through her (and Jbradt too by his association with Lab Rat). The innocent's didn't even bother to investigate Lab Rat before voting her for lynching. Her scummy behavior as communicating mafia in that game was that obvious.
So Annie.. kindly explain how you've determined that Lab Rat's game now is contradictory to when she's played evil in the past. In both recent examples, Lab's play as an evil was completely different while both of these scum roles were virtually identical.
The only difference I can see is in Example #2, Lab Rat no longer benefitted from us giving her slack for being a newcomer... Lab Rat felt more comfortable, had settled in with this mafia game crowd, and had a feel for the other players here. She was more vocal and more prominent about everything she posted. As her natural style became more evident to the rest of us, however, her ability to fool people by inventing farfetched theories and posting crap logic failed completely. That's what I see her doing now being so defensive, posting untruths, and using bs logic. This style of play is totally consistent with the way she played last time as communicating scum.
So again, I ask you, Annie.. how is this contradictory at all?
There as Annie had to correct "lynch" to "banish," he's also voted for the wrong person and had to correct that, as well.
Makes quick vote and disappears... as I pointed out in the following post when I questioned him about that.
So Annie appears to be busy. I accepted that and waited to see what he'd post after having his supper and catching up.
Okay... Annie found 4 posts to question. Not much else to contribute after that, except...
This is very interesting.
Where's the contradiction in Lab Rat's playing style as an evil, Annie? The two games where I've seen her as evil before... are not the least bit consistent with each other.
Example 1 -- In the Gunslinger game, Lab didn't know anyone she was up against and she had you, Zaffy, and TRS (fellow evils) to communicate with. Lab did an awesome job in that game staying low keyed and her posts were simple and to the point. But she played her noob card to the max in that game... not letting on how experienced she was playing mafia elsewhere. Lab Rat made exceptional use of that noob card and most of the rest of us fell for that, giving Lab Rat an enormous benefit of doubt. Her game strategy and tactics were very good.... mainly because the rest of us didn't know her yet. And her evil team won that game. However,.....
Example 2 -- Lab Rat got to play communicating evil again in the last game (aligned with the mob boss vs. mayor). In a similarly evil communicating role, Lab Rat's playing style was not consistent with her previous game whatsoever. In fact, her style was totally different. Her posts were very scummy... to the point where the innocent team could see right through her (and Jbradt too by his association with Lab Rat). The innocent's didn't even bother to investigate Lab Rat before voting her for lynching. Her scummy behavior as communicating mafia in that game was that obvious.
So Annie.. kindly explain how you've determined that Lab Rat's game now is contradictory to when she's played evil in the past. In both recent examples, Lab's play as an evil was completely different while both of these scum roles were virtually identical.
The only difference I can see is in Example #2, Lab Rat no longer benefitted from us giving her slack for being a newcomer... Lab Rat felt more comfortable, had settled in with this mafia game crowd, and had a feel for the other players here. She was more vocal and more prominent about everything she posted. As her natural style became more evident to the rest of us, however, her ability to fool people by inventing farfetched theories and posting crap logic failed completely. That's what I see her doing now being so defensive, posting untruths, and using bs logic. This style of play is totally consistent with the way she played last time as communicating scum.
So again, I ask you, Annie.. how is this contradictory at all?
There as Annie had to correct "lynch" to "banish," he's also voted for the wrong person and had to correct that, as well.
