So then, in your opinion, whose lynch would at least yield more information than FF's?
Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play
- Thread starter dirtydawg10
- Start date
So then, in your opinion, whose lynch would at least yield more information than FF's?
Nearly anyone IMO. Throw a rock. At least with other players, they make an amount of sense that can be recognized (even if not agreed with). Lynching a player like that COULD give us more info to go on becuase it's not all about interpretation.
So your philosophy is lets have everyone vote for a random person instead of voting for the person who has shown the most scumness by what they have posted? I think day 1 votes should always be for the person who has acted the scummiest. Not always will you be able to learn something from what happened if they turn out to be innocent but if they are mafia you will learn something from it.
I was just rereading the thread trying to figure out who to vote for, and this post struck me from Noods:
mg:.
Apparently, twisting words runs in the genes. When did I ever say vote for someone random? Pull the post... please. The point I'm trying to make is let's scrutinize posts of players who say things that make sense. Out of everything that's been said there's bound to be more there. FF will make clear what he is on his own.
Really, I'm getting the feeling that people just aren't reading.
This game has started off like the last one. I've also not seen day 1's with this much to go on. Yet I keep seeing awesome players saying "it's day 1, there's never anything to go on." Labby and Pap are in the group saying this... I don't remember who else at this point. I would ordinarily agree with this statement, except that there has been a flurry of serious posting with a long time yet to go before nightfall. In all this posting, if the best thing you have to go on is FF, then shame on you for phoning in your participation. Added to that, I used that exact same argument last game to great effect. I'm not buying the "it's only day 1 thing a bit at this point."
Then I came across this... :rofl::laugh:
mg:.Apparently, twisting words runs in the genes. When did I ever say vote for someone random? Pull the post... please. The point I'm trying to make is let's scrutinize posts of players who say things that make sense. Out of everything that's been said there's bound to be more there. FF will make clear what he is on his own.
Really, I'm getting the feeling that people just aren't reading.
Sorry I haven't been around, (it is tough to think about coming to the game thread with Kashta half drunk and half naked next to you on the sofa) :thumbsup:
Anyway, I am a little concerned here with the way this day has gone. First of all, history has a way of repeating itself unless we can learn from it.
Last game I was accused of being preoccupied with FF and got my teeth kicked in for it. This game everyone is jumping on Labbys band wagon.
lets look at history. Day 1 lynches have been what? INNOCENTS do we want to repeat that on this game?
Yes FF did get very confusing, we are talking about FF here.
Yes he did contradict himself. (see above)Re read the thread, he didn't get contradictory to himself or sound scummy until under the gun from LR. Who, by the way, gets the same way when she is under the gun.
I don't agree Lr is looking at others as she claims. What I see is LR campaigning to get FF lynched.
Just my own half drunk and over tired observation.
Since I do need to get up early for work, I need to vote now.
I vote to lynch LR
It seems to me that she found an easy day one target and wants to run with it.
Anyway, I am a little concerned here with the way this day has gone. First of all, history has a way of repeating itself unless we can learn from it.
Last game I was accused of being preoccupied with FF and got my teeth kicked in for it. This game everyone is jumping on Labbys band wagon.
lets look at history. Day 1 lynches have been what? INNOCENTS do we want to repeat that on this game?
Yes FF did get very confusing, we are talking about FF here.
Yes he did contradict himself. (see above)Re read the thread, he didn't get contradictory to himself or sound scummy until under the gun from LR. Who, by the way, gets the same way when she is under the gun.
I don't agree Lr is looking at others as she claims. What I see is LR campaigning to get FF lynched.
Just my own half drunk and over tired observation.
Since I do need to get up early for work, I need to vote now.
I vote to lynch LR
It seems to me that she found an easy day one target and wants to run with it.
Can you expand on the bolded part Rich?
This is the most reasonable excuse for this vote that I've seen yet.
I was going to try to make some points, but screw it. I vote to lynch Labby.
I think I've made my reasons clear, but for the sake of good form, I'll go through the bullet points.
1. she has stated several times that she's been looking at other suspects, but the only one's I've seen listed are those of us not attacking FF. and I haven't seen any reasoning other than that.
2. the way I read the thread, she's either twisted words and stats to suit her purpose or just really misunderstood. I'm willing to risk her life to find out.
3. FF makes an easy target. Which is why it was so easy to implicate Wiz last game. It seems to me like Labby could be using this as a convenient distraction. Really, IMO, FF is only a distraction when the town lets him be.
4. I don't like the train at all.
I think I've made my reasons clear, but for the sake of good form, I'll go through the bullet points.
1. she has stated several times that she's been looking at other suspects, but the only one's I've seen listed are those of us not attacking FF. and I haven't seen any reasoning other than that.
2. the way I read the thread, she's either twisted words and stats to suit her purpose or just really misunderstood. I'm willing to risk her life to find out.
3. FF makes an easy target. Which is why it was so easy to implicate Wiz last game. It seems to me like Labby could be using this as a convenient distraction. Really, IMO, FF is only a distraction when the town lets him be.
4. I don't like the train at all.
I was just rereading the thread trying to figure out who to vote for, and this post struck me from Noods:
This game has started off like the last one. I've also not seen day 1's with this much to go on. Yet I keep seeing awesome players saying "it's day 1, there's never anything to go on." Labby and Pap are in the group saying this... I don't remember who else at this point. I would ordinarily agree with this statement, except that there has been a flurry of serious posting with a long time yet to go before nightfall. In all this posting, if the best thing you have to go on is FF, then shame on you for phoning in your participation. Added to that, I used that exact same argument last game to great effect. I'm not buying the "it's only day 1 thing a bit at this point."
Then I came across this... :rofl::laugh:
Apparently, twisting words runs in the genes. When did I ever say vote for someone random? Pull the post... please. The point I'm trying to make is let's scrutinize posts of players who say things that make sense. Out of everything that's been said there's bound to be more there. FF will make clear what he is on his own.
Really, I'm getting the feeling that people just aren't reading.
Really JB? Is your memory span that short?
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
First of all, I know that Labby isn't an IW this game, there may be some things I miss but I am not that dense, but thank you for the hit up on the lack of confidence in my theories or thoughts. My point was that her "play" is very different than it was last game and Labby already explained that. I don't need additional comments and additional explanations from some peanut gallery... but thanks anyway....
you sure are quick to defend her though.... how about others who are playing "differently" from the last game or other games before this? Why does the pointing out of this bother you about Labby and no one else that's accused of not playing the same?
As far "me questioning Labby's ability to think about all possibilities", this is something Labby does or has done in other games as an innocent or helper of the town.... and I pointed it out that it seems to be missing from this game.
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
Since there isn't much to look through in your posts, I have found that even YOU have even mentioned a player's actions of last game... which now peaks my interest even moreso on why you seem to be lying down a defense for Lab.
