I thought the question was who started the code word thing with LG. Anyway, we now know the answer to both questions.
Mafia #70: The Time Vortex
- Thread starter jpappy789
- Start date
I thought the question was who started the code word thing with LG. Anyway, we now know the answer to both questions.
OgreMkV
Father of Earth's Next Emperor
I'm not turning on anyone. I'm not less sure of my vote on Zsand. I'm voting for him now... I will continue to vote for him until he's lynched, I'm dead, or a detective type clears him.
However, there are still two other mafia out there. Do you want me to stop thinking and considering others because I'm focused on Zsand?
I'm really confused/concerned by this? Have you two never been named subjects before? Would you feel the say way about, say Madcrawdad, if he had presented the exact same analysis?
Noods, please explain to me how I'm backpedalling on Zsand. Because I don't see it. I see you and John, having been named by myself, with some logical analysis, turning on me and saying that you are both unsure of me now.
Yet, once again... NOTHING HAS CHANGED... except that I said, that under certain conditions (stated in detail) I would consider you guys to be likely mafia. As soon as I said that, with John's and Noods, next post, I become a subject of uncertainty and confusion.
If you disagree with my analysis with respect to you fine. Say so and say why. Does that in any way, shape, or form, change the analysis towards Zsand? If so, then say so and say why.
I note that you're still voting Z. I sorry that you are both upset that I don't consider you being pure as driven snow. But do you have anything substantial to add to the discussion or just vague feelings of unhappiness?
However, there are still two other mafia out there. Do you want me to stop thinking and considering others because I'm focused on Zsand?
I'm really confused/concerned by this? Have you two never been named subjects before? Would you feel the say way about, say Madcrawdad, if he had presented the exact same analysis?
Noods, please explain to me how I'm backpedalling on Zsand. Because I don't see it. I see you and John, having been named by myself, with some logical analysis, turning on me and saying that you are both unsure of me now.
Yet, once again... NOTHING HAS CHANGED... except that I said, that under certain conditions (stated in detail) I would consider you guys to be likely mafia. As soon as I said that, with John's and Noods, next post, I become a subject of uncertainty and confusion.
If you disagree with my analysis with respect to you fine. Say so and say why. Does that in any way, shape, or form, change the analysis towards Zsand? If so, then say so and say why.
I note that you're still voting Z. I sorry that you are both upset that I don't consider you being pure as driven snow. But do you have anything substantial to add to the discussion or just vague feelings of unhappiness?
Yes, I would feel the same if someone else suggested that analogy of why I would be scum if Zs turns up innocent. It makes no sense that I would be mafia because I moved my vote from LG to Zs, and NO it is not logical at all. That is what I am getting at. So, as the day progressed I became less sure of LG and more sure of Z. That makes me scum? I dont get it. In all honesty, I seriously doubt Z will turn up innocent, I just dont like false assumptions made about me with no meat to back it up. It feels like you are starting to point fingers in other directions in case you come up wrong to keep your fanny out of the frying pan. Sorry but I am not in the mood to take the heat for you.
and no, "my feelings of unhappiness" about this are not "vague". I certainly do not expect you to declare that I am innocent........
Still not caught up with a lot of what went on yesterday, but trying to stay up-to-date, with plans to catch up later today/tonight.
The whole LG train got started because she said 'fish' and then 'RAT'...I was also accused of saying 'fish'. As I said, I wasn't jumping on-board with that.
With regard to Z, his play is off this game, but as I told Ogre, I wasn't ready to lynch Z because of it. I recall you actually agreeing with me on that statement yesterday.
Kind of unusual that you would ask this question, as you saw my responses yesterday... You specifically asked me about LG, and agreed with me about Z.
Ogre, what do you think of Lab's last-minute question, asking where she should place her vote as N1 fell?
Not sure what you want to hear from me. You asked me about LG yesterday and Ogre asked me about Z.
The whole LG train got started because she said 'fish' and then 'RAT'...I was also accused of saying 'fish'. As I said, I wasn't jumping on-board with that.
With regard to Z, his play is off this game, but as I told Ogre, I wasn't ready to lynch Z because of it. I recall you actually agreeing with me on that statement yesterday.
Kind of unusual that you would ask this question, as you saw my responses yesterday... You specifically asked me about LG, and agreed with me about Z.
I'd like to address this, but I'll wait until after Zaffy answers first.
Why's my name coming into this?
Im getting worried. Why are you so defensive? If you really didnt care that they disagree then why are you arguing?
clicked post to soon.
And why the emphasis on "NOTHING HAS CHANGED"? Something most definitely has changed, or else you wouldnt mind people saying so.
FF you are beginning to worry me more than usual...oh and you weren't around at nightfall.
It doesn't hurt to hear the story again just in case the story changes. I grouped you in with the others that didn't vote for LG or Z. I didn't want you to feel left out. Have your feelings on Z changed at all today?
