LG being innocent has cleared lab in my mind. Lab and LG have played together often and Lab says LG has a tendency to protect scum and she didn't try to protect lab and LG came up innocent, and the tone was too light between lab and LG.
Dawg is getting more suspicious to me in the fact that he jumped on PP for learning how to multiquote so quickly and then flipped and protected him at one point.
Rich isn't that suspicious to me, last game when I played scum with him he was much quieter and this game he has been much more vocal.
Okay DD knows we lost 3 geeks but now doesn't know one of them was Pap? I'm having trouble with that.
DOH!! all I paid attention to was the geeks.
However, still does not explain Bally's reason for placing me in her list.... now it's because she coulda sworn I played with her? Come on.... I have felt pretty strongly about JM being a jock and I still do but Bally is quickly beginning to climb the ladder aboce him. If I do switch my vote, it willdefinitely go to Bally.
they aren't huh....
I guess I didn't pay so much attention to WHO it was, just what they were...
Well Jm it will be your word against mine.....
I am the Detective.
On night one Dawg was investigated and proven innocent
Day 2 I investigated Lab who also turned out to be innocent.
In the end it is the decision of the ACU.
If lynching me means revealing Jm for the scum he is I will gladly be lynched.
Bally, I thought that you were just talking about how dawg could be scum? Now you just said you found him to be innocent on day 1. If you knew he was innocent, how could you still hold him a suspect? And why would you invest dawg if you were so convinced JB was up to no good?
And if you really got the PM, or at least read the rules, you would know that Network Guru is really the term.
This may sound crazy, but I don't like how freaking quickly Ice and DD voted to lynch Bally. I'm pretty darn sure both of them are scum, and that Bally is, but part of me thinks we should lynch Ice or DD instead of Bally. Any one else think that is a good idea?
I was wondering about why so many people jumped on Bally for coming out. I would like to hear from those who voted Bally...what made you choose to vote Bally over JM?
I disagree...cool kids don't have to continually try and convince geeks that they are cool. Only a geek who longs to be cool does that. Just embrace your geekdom Ice :silly:
For now I vote to lynch PP (Patrick Paul - I just wanted to say PP)
I think a Jock would more likely try to convince us they are a geek than the other way around. We need more mafia strategy talk and a little less fluffy geek talk.
JM's post does seem strange to me too. Not 100% sure what to think right now.
Right now though I'd say my top 2 suspects are still PP and Maverick also makes my list. Not so much because of the vote on me but more because of the reasoning for the vote on me. I'll have to keep a close eye on him.
I know I stated my top 2 suspects and this is currently not one of them but...
I vote to lynch FF
I don't have a problem voting for PP right now either but FF just doesn't seem like himself. Only 6 posts thus far tells me something is up with him too. I figur I'll put my vote on FF and see if that gets him to participate more in this game.
I am believing JM over Bally for a few reasons.
1. I didn't see why scum would need to false role claim at that time when JM came out. It was a smart time for the network guru to come out as the scum team about has our town over a barrel if there are indeed 5 scum.
2. JM's reasoning for investigating LG on night 1 made sense. He also adamantly backed her being innocent all throughout day 2. It all holds.
3. JM said he investigated me on night 2. His reasoning as to why he investigated me makes sense as well.
4. If Bally had truly investigated you, she would not continue saying you were suspicious or scummy. That makes no sense, nor do her reasons for why she investigated you or I.
Dawg, who is on your scum list? Do you see the merit in voting out Ice or DD tonight instead of Bally or JM?