Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] Hammerhead 991]

Hammerhead, I took your original question as just that. A simple question. I didn’t second-guess your motive or turn this back around on you with a “why would you ask me that?” kind of response. You asked me (for whatever reason) and I answered you, then continued on to pull quotes and post other comments you chose to overlook.

Now I read this comment from you..above.

What began as some general distaste for role play posts or simple curiosity about me has today evolved into a full blown accusation that I made that post to scream my innocence. Whaaaaat??? Why in the world would you put THAT spin on this about any player on Day 1 if you are seriously looking out for the town’s benefit?

A role play post really is just that. If made by an innocent, it reveals nothing whatsoever. If made by scum, it tells us that they post lies in the game. Well, duh!!! Lol….who in this game doesn’t already expect this?

I vote to lynch Hammerhead 991

This is someone NOT playing a pro-town game.

Erm? Omgus much. How is copy and pasting the PM mad sent you (innocent PM) and posting it in here randomly NOT screaming innocence?

 

[[AC] C-note]

I have no problem continuing to banter throughout the game, so no reason to be nervous about day 1 going from fluffy fluff towards a more serious note. In fact, I find that to be quite a fun part of the game. I do think you may have been trying to set me up. Not sure where you're getting OMGUS from, maybe you could clarify that. Also, I don't understand your statement about me protesting too much...where did I protest at all? I know how off on a fluffy tangent I can go, hence me saying I needed to get back on track since it's so close to nightfall. Sorry, but I don't like to screw around when it's so close to decision time, though maybe you would have preferred I continue on the fluffy tangent.

I have no problem with you voting on gut instinct, though your guts certainly seem to be telling you the wrong thing (maybe you ate something that didn't agree with them? Did you eat Lenore with Rickets?) I will likely be voting on gut instinct as well, since I haven't seen anything solid yet to vote on (not to mention, day 1 there is hardly anything solid). I'm going to think on my vote for another hour or so, but there is one person right now who seems to be dodging questions and distracting. My vote will likely land on them, though it's gut instinct.

I already explained what I meant by the protesting comment. You're trying too hard to convince the town that you're "scum hunting". Seems to be a bit overboard to me. The "protesting too much" comment is a reference to Hamlet. Dang you're a very concrete thinker, huh?

 

[[AC] Tree_Hugger]

Vote Count (thru post 279) - red indicates that vote has been retracted

Scoop (3) - wing 168, Doom 196, Star 274
Nem (3) - Driver 261, HH 269, Gun 278
Nar (2) - mael 240, gold 268
C-note (1) - O3T 192
Mael (1) - Nem 236
UhOh (1) - RICK 237
Doom (1) - UhOh 271
Tib (1) - C-note 272
Gun (1) - BH 275
HH (1) - chup 277
O3T (0) - RICK 186

No Vote: HI IQ, Nar, scoop, Tib, Tree

Reminder: No lynch if vote is tied at nightfall

Hmmm...no lynch if vote is tied at nightfall. Seems like a good way for scum to keep a teammate from being lynched. Just tie up the vote. It could also be used as an excuse for scum to break the tie and seal the fate of an innocent. The only benefit to us is if the scum do try this it may help us later in the game when we find out who is what. Not sure if I like that rule or not yet.

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

in game in which you want everyone to assume your innocent, and in this case largely noncommunicating, why would you classify yourself as being in a group? I find his use of "we" note worthy. Is it substantial evidence to vote someone during the latter part of the game? No, not at all. But in the context of day 1 I find it to be possibly important.

I say "we" quite a bit as in "we" need to come together, "we" need to weed out the bad guys ect....so personally I don't see what you mean here.

What I think is if Nem had been talking to more than 2 players the word "we" could have been used to reference all the players as a whole, but the fact that there were only 2 told to hush and Narwhal lumps them together as a group by using the term "we" makes it stand out to me.

Had I been Narwhal, I personally would have phrased it that they told "me" or "I" to stop posting.

Again, I don't get your point, "we" when talking about your self and another person makes perfect sense to me, they didn't tell just one person to be quiet....why would you phrase it as just yourself, if asked about it?

+10000000



If your doing this again this game, knock it off. Enough is enough, I hope that your able to refrain yourself this game, I don't want it to end up like the last one.



I kinda see where your going with this, but I don't think it is a big enough problem to vote someone for. IMO as long as we don't get side tracked on trying to figure out identities I don't mind any subtle hints and what not. Still, it's not enough for a vote IMO.

Can you say major over reaction here?

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

Erm? Omgus much. How is copy and pasting the PM mad sent you (innocent PM) and posting it in here randomly NOT screaming innocence?

Hold on.....did I miss something? Where was this copy/pasted at?

Looks like Star-Crossed won the third vote lotto

Hmmm, pretty interesting thing to bring up.....were you the first to comment earlier about who would be the 3rd vote?

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

Who will be the "infamous" third vote on Scoop? The inmates want to know.

Well , yes it looks like you were. So tell me why is it so important to you to bring this up? It just gives the feel you know what Scoop is and want it to be taken notice of.

 

[[AC] Star-Crossed]

I took the mention of the third vote the latest time as being a joke but it certainly brings up the issue if scoop ends up winning the vote (which at this point it could go any which way) and flips scum I would put Rick as next in line.

 

[[AC] Star-Crossed]

Hmmm...no lynch if vote is tied at nightfall. Seems like a good way for scum to keep a teammate from being lynched. Just tie up the vote. It could also be used as an excuse for scum to break the tie and seal the fate of an innocent. The only benefit to us is if the scum do try this it may help us later in the game when we find out who is what. Not sure if I like that rule or not yet.

Over 24 hours of discussion since your last post and the only thing you can comment on is a rule?

 

[[AC] Hammerhead 991]

Sorry for being absent so long. My time is limited but I'll contribute as much as I can in the time I have. Read through the posts and will comment about my thoughts to this point.

Awakening slowly from psychotic-drug induced nightmares, Chupa tries to make sense of the crumpled note he has trouble even focusing on.



Chupa sighs, mumbles "need to get out" then doses off again on the thin lumpy mattress.

Post 187 I think, I'm on my iPhone and i cant see the post number but there is a quote within the quote I did above.

 

[[AC] C-note]

I took the mention of the third vote the latest time as being a joke but it certainly brings up the issue if scoop ends up winning the vote (which at this point it could go any which way) and flips scum I would put Rick as next in line.

I don't understand why Rick would be implicated if Scoop turns scum. Wouldn't it be more incriminating if Scoops flipped townie?