[AC] Tiburon321;2588826 said:Where is this PM post by Chup? I went back to around post 187 and can't find anything. I see role playing in Chup's first of that succession of posts, but not a role claim whatsoever. Please point it out for me.
+1
[AC] Tiburon321;2588826 said:Where is this PM post by Chup? I went back to around post 187 and can't find anything. I see role playing in Chup's first of that succession of posts, but not a role claim whatsoever. Please point it out for me.
[AC] Tiburon321;2588826 said:Where is this PM post by Chup? I went back to around post 187 and can't find anything. I see role playing in Chup's first of that succession of posts, but not a role claim whatsoever. Please point it out for me.
[AC] chupacabra;2588505 said:Sorry for being absent so long. My time is limited but I'll contribute as much as I can in the time I have. Read through the posts and will comment about my thoughts to this point.
Awakening slowly from psychotic-drug induced nightmares, Chupa tries to make sense of the crumpled note he has trouble even focusing on.
Chupa sighs, mumbles "need to get out" then doses off again on the thin lumpy mattress.
Ok, so maybe I'm just dumb, but where exactly is the role claim? Per the rules, EVERYONE got a PM, including townies. If the crumpled note thing is what you're talking about then I don't buy it as a RC at all. Makes me think HH is trying to stir up a bunch of junk before nightfall.[AC] HI IQ;2588830 said:Tib, you have to go to the post itself, since it is a quote within a quote.
what post, who is this directed to?[AC] narwhal;2588832 said:How does that post make you think Chupa is scum?
[AC] scoop411;2588835 said:what post, who is this directed to?
I wonder that myself, hope you get an answer as I would like to know as well.[AC] wing nut;2588827 said:Never a good idea and usually scum that do push it
I may have missed it, I did skim to get caught up and only pulled what caught my eye, but how was that post anti town? I will go back and reread in full but an answer would still be appreciated.
This could be one of two things, a warning to a team mate or just courtesy. Something to tuck in the back of the old mind.
Really an eye opener. My first thought is rickets is trying to scare players off of voting scoop there by protecting him. But it could also be scoop is innocent and rickets is setting up another innocent for tomorrow by bringing this up.
as you see i wondered the same thing but feel its a protection ploy
I agree
should have used Pat from SNL
Funny you bring this up again, but Nem got 3 votes before scoop did, why didn't you feel the need to comment on that?
I hope I explained this well enough above.
Any one have any thoughts on why Rickets would comment on Scoops possible third vote but made no mention of Nem getting 3 votes even though it occurred first? Ricket your reason would be most important to me.
No, I do not believe it was their PM as I said when you click the quote it takes you to the opening rules.[AC] narwhal;2588829 said:There is no PM quote. The quote within a quote is from the opening post of the game, by Madcrawdad.
Why would any innocent person feel the need to try so hard (especially on day 1) to try and yell out I'm innocent?[AC] narwhal;2588832 said:How does that post make you think Chupa is scum?
[AC] HI IQ;2588839 said:I wonder that myself, hope you get an answer as I would like to know as well.
No, I do not believe it was their PM as I said when you click the quote it takes you to the opening rules.
Why would any innocent person feel the need to try so hard (especially on day 1) to try and yell out I'm innocent?
[AC] Hammerhead 991;2588795 said:Erm? Omgus much. How is copy and pasting the PM mad sent you (innocent PM) and posting it in here randomly NOT screaming innocence?