[AC] Star-Crossed;2622695 said:
Someone has to do the work in this game, building cases on people who look scummy and trying to sort out who is scum from who is townie. Would you rather I sit back and not jump on things that strike me as scummy?
Also, what did Bally do a good job on correcting? Did you fail to notice that she admitted to skimming the very post she used for her reason for voting for GL? That she failed to retract her vote, even knowing nightfall wasn't until tomorrow night.
You say she kicked the wrong bush, what bush was that? Throwing a vote on someone whose post she didn't even bother to read?
Although I agree with Star on some points in regards to Bally, I am still a little concerned about one phrase from Star that really stood out for me.
"Building cases" on players because they "look scummy" is a totally opportunistic way to play.... and that's often a scum-tell in itself.
[AC] Star-Crossed;2623270 said:
The pre-nightfall things I wanted to address:
I build cases on those who look scummy to me. Are you suggesting I should build a case on someone who seems pro-town? I most certainly won't forget about those who do not seem scummy to me, but you bet I'll focus my energies on those I see as most scummy. It strikes me very odd you would suggest I do otherwise...trying to plant seeds of doubt for later?
I am a wicked fast reader.
There were a couple of things FF posted that originally made me go huh? but upon revisiting them I was able to make more sense of them.
To answer your questions, Star.......
Was I suggesting you should build a case on innocents? No.
Was I trying to plant seeds of doubt? No.
My point was that it's harmful for an innocent to "build" a case against anybody just because they can... merely because they "look" evil or can easily be made to appear evil.
Innocents aren't the ones who "build" cases out of anything they can use; that's what the evils are for.
Someone honestly working for the town should instead dig for clues, stick to facts as much as possible, and weigh different possibilities with some reasonable amount of objectivity. That's something you haven't done at all this game.
Initially, I did trust your gut reaction to Bally's game play not only because of what Bally did (unfortunate) but also because (if innocent), I knew you'd be someone who'd pick up on a scum-tell like that from Bally.... better than I would myself.
Unfortunately, you're also someone who would know how to rattle Bally even more than she was already and to fully take advantage of her for making mistakes.
Because of timing, I was forced to place a real early vote and that's all that stood out to me that soon.
For whatever reasons, Bally made some poor choices in this game. And I still don't understand why that happened, Bally is a
much better player than what we saw from her this time. So, yeah... If she weren't already dead, my vote today would have most likely gone her way.
The only reluctance I had in voting her yesterday was that I also caught a tell-tale slip you made by admitting that you were "building" cases (scummy) instead of looking for clues/details to decide if they were useful or not (not scummy).