Personally, I am not looking at those who voted FF/Ice I am looking at those who voted Confirmed innocents both days. Where would you have us look with the information we have at hand?
Do you really think someone as good as Ice can be manipulated? I find it hard to believe that the scum would use or try to use that kind of strategy.
When I began looking at those who voted innocents on both nights, I said that i didn't think we would find the whole team there. Your telling us where not to look without giving direction on where to look makes me wonder about your alignment.
Red - We should look beyond the obvious as well for the reasons I just posted. I find it interesting that you don't agree with that considering how often Day 1/2 is made up of innocents voting innocents.
That makes you a good place to look, Wizard. Dawg and Zaffy too.
Blue - I said it made sense for them to try manipulating Ice if they can. It would be foolish not to attempt it. However, I did not say that strategy would be successful. Ice is sharp and often questions those most who try to bamboozle him.
Black - Again, let me sum this up for you. As I believe was shown by my posts with Dawg last night, Dawg has not given us great direction to follow. Dawg as an innocent usually plays his game more objectively than that and using logic that is sound.
Given that Dawg also did a 180 reversal on me when he retracted his vote... a very SHORT time after his "twist twist twist" accusatory vote post against me was odd. That made be believe I was on to something with him and he may have felt that if he backed off on me that maybe I'd back off on him.
Looking back at others Dawg mentioned in possible suspicious ways, I found it interesting too that Dawg addressed a Bally vs. Kashta scenario (regarding low posters).... but even after acknowledging Zaffy had less than 5 posts too along with me at that time.... Dawg didn't mention Zaffy again or give me the other scenario Zaffy vs. Kashta when he decided to vote me over post count. When trying to decide alignment in Dawg's case, it's always important to look at what he leaves out or doesn't say as much as what he tells us. I consider that a telling omission in his case.
If Dawg is evil, there's a good chance Zaffy is too. Bally, Zaffy, DD, and FF are the only names he really mentioned earlier. DD was a joke vote/retracted. He gave us reason to also consider Zaffy suspect too but has let that drop altogether. As scum, it's prudent to somewhere mention a teammate for distancing purposes. That would make Zaffy a prime candidate as scummate with Dawg.
Couple this with the fact that you, Dawg, and Zaffy seem to be in agreement suspecting folks like AAF, Dun, and Lab Rat gives me a very uneasy feeling. I would expect all three of you (if innocent) to be much less narrow-focused at this point in the game.
Clear enough for you now, Wizard?
