Wow,
After reading the entire thread, I think I have something to add. Purebred working and sporting dogs were developed with a purpose in mind. Collies were bred to work as herding dogs, Shar Peis were bred as guard dogs, Labradors were bred as retrievers, greyhounds were developed for tracking and chasing, etc. etc. etc. It is understood that Pit Bulls were bred originally as working dogs in the cattle industry. However, this breed developed over time as a dog for bearbaiting, bullbaiting, and fighting. These traits include an inclination to operating as a pack, extremely strong shoulders, chest, and jaws, unbelievable drive and an incredible tolerance for pain. These traits were enhanced through selective breeding over the course of many generations. The same goes for Labrador Retrievers. This dog is a descendant of the Newfoundland. Certain traits and characteristics were enhanced through selective breeding to encourage this dog to bring back game birds including a strong inclination to swim, a "soft" mouth, tremendous drive, and the ability to take a number of commands from multiple hunters. Fast-forward to present day. The overwhelming majority of Lab owners do not use their dogs in hunting scenarios. Most Labs haven't been bred for their retrieving ability for dozens, if not hundreds of generations. If this is the case, then why does Sport the yellow lab go nuts over a frisbee or tennis ball, or anything he can bring back for you? The answer is simple: these dogs have an ingrained genetic makeup that drives them to fetch items for their owner. I feel like the same premise goes towards many of the terrier breeds that ended up in the fighting arena. Even though the intended purpose of the dog is hundreds of generations removed, the instinct still remains. That being said, I do not feel comfortable being around an animal that is 1- of a pack nature and 2- genetically predisposed to bring down animals of any type that pose a threat.
Finally, while other dogs may bite more, how many breed types are responsible for killing people? How many human deaths are caused by Labradors, or Poodles, or Goldens or Cockers per year? How many deaths are caused by large terrier breeds?
Part of responsible dog ownership is recognizing that there is no such thing as a "safe" breed. This fact has been illustrated repeatedly in this thread. I will go past that premise and say that the other part of responsible dog ownership is recognizing an animals potential to inflict injury or death. That being said, I think that the overall number of dogs that have the inclination to hurt people and animals outside of their pack needs to be seriously examined.
After reading the entire thread, I think I have something to add. Purebred working and sporting dogs were developed with a purpose in mind. Collies were bred to work as herding dogs, Shar Peis were bred as guard dogs, Labradors were bred as retrievers, greyhounds were developed for tracking and chasing, etc. etc. etc. It is understood that Pit Bulls were bred originally as working dogs in the cattle industry. However, this breed developed over time as a dog for bearbaiting, bullbaiting, and fighting. These traits include an inclination to operating as a pack, extremely strong shoulders, chest, and jaws, unbelievable drive and an incredible tolerance for pain. These traits were enhanced through selective breeding over the course of many generations. The same goes for Labrador Retrievers. This dog is a descendant of the Newfoundland. Certain traits and characteristics were enhanced through selective breeding to encourage this dog to bring back game birds including a strong inclination to swim, a "soft" mouth, tremendous drive, and the ability to take a number of commands from multiple hunters. Fast-forward to present day. The overwhelming majority of Lab owners do not use their dogs in hunting scenarios. Most Labs haven't been bred for their retrieving ability for dozens, if not hundreds of generations. If this is the case, then why does Sport the yellow lab go nuts over a frisbee or tennis ball, or anything he can bring back for you? The answer is simple: these dogs have an ingrained genetic makeup that drives them to fetch items for their owner. I feel like the same premise goes towards many of the terrier breeds that ended up in the fighting arena. Even though the intended purpose of the dog is hundreds of generations removed, the instinct still remains. That being said, I do not feel comfortable being around an animal that is 1- of a pack nature and 2- genetically predisposed to bring down animals of any type that pose a threat.
Finally, while other dogs may bite more, how many breed types are responsible for killing people? How many human deaths are caused by Labradors, or Poodles, or Goldens or Cockers per year? How many deaths are caused by large terrier breeds?
Part of responsible dog ownership is recognizing that there is no such thing as a "safe" breed. This fact has been illustrated repeatedly in this thread. I will go past that premise and say that the other part of responsible dog ownership is recognizing an animals potential to inflict injury or death. That being said, I think that the overall number of dogs that have the inclination to hurt people and animals outside of their pack needs to be seriously examined.