let's face it, pitties (and quite a number of other breeds) are more dangerous, based soley on their larger size and greater strength. This doesn't mean they are bad breeds. It means more care must be taken with them. This doesn't excuse bad behavior/training (or lack of it) from even the smallest ****zu(sp?). The main problem is with the owners of the dogs, or if they are feral. Laws should be ennacted/enforced against these bad owners, but this is a difficult thing because you don't always know there's a problem until after a bad incident. In the mean time, and unfortunatly, laws need to be geared toward the dogs themselves. This should possibly/probably apply to all breeds, for fairness sake. And even though not life threatening to an adult, a ****zu bite would still hurt and be annoying. I feel the Ontario law, if agreed upon by the majority is not a bad, if not a good, compromise. Certainly better than a law allowing officials to confiscate and kill all dogs of a breed based soley on their breed. Let's face it, dog owners (myself included, with three large breeds) possibly won't like these laws, but they are needed to balance the rights of dog owners with the right of public saftey. If you think about it our legal systems laws are based upon the rights of the public to be safe from others misdeeds. Sometimes these laws limit the actions of responsible people. Compromise.