THE PLAY: Mafia #16 'Till death do we part...

[jpappy789]

Thanks, jpap...when pulled together like that, I understand the connection I didn't understand reading for the first time.....

no prob. I understand how it might be confusing

 

[Blueiz]

My mistake on you removing the comma Jo, however you DID agree with it without double checking.

 

[jpappy789]

My mistake on you removing the comma Jo, however you DID agree with it without double checking.

Not defending jo as I have some suspicions of him but jo said he thought DD's mistake was bigger than mine so he kept his vote on her. He never agreed with what I said. No one did. I didn't after Ice pointed out what happened.

 

[jpappy789]

yeah, i noticed that too jpap... but at least you admit it was a mistake.

here blue. Ice pointed it out pretty much right after it happened and jo repsonded with this. He never agreed with what I had sad about DD.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

upon review of last nights posts I feel Jo pushed the hardest to lynch DD.
I retract my vote for Jpap, and vote to lynch Joe

I agree fully with Charlie.

I vote to lynch Jo. (subj to change at any time)

I didnt say Charlie was the only one I agreed with, I quoted what Charlie said and put my thoughts under it. Just because i agree with one person doesnt mean I disagree with others that have said the same thing..that wouldn't make very much sense at all, now would it?

He was the only one that you apparently "fully agreed" with. These are back to back posts made less than 30 minutes apart. He's had my curiousity piqued a bit because he's not been actively looking for weasels and like I said to you earlier, I found the timing odd. What about that can't you understand? Would you not find it odd if I suddenly voted for someone with the same "I fully agree with you ____" post after others had made much better cases on the person (i.e. Plant's case for Jo)?

 

[Rbishop]

Just a generic comment, not trying to stop or start anything...but the last several games have had some massive two or three way arguements, that mainly were hard for ACville.

While I feel that knocking on doors and chasing the scummies is correct, I also feel that often some of the players get so side tracked on a "did to - did not" arguement based on players opinions, all other posts get ignored.

And it can be intimidating to low posters and newbies.

I feel if your initial case doesn't seem to get an overwhelming response in your desired achievements, maybe your case isn't really that strong or obvious...

Would it be more beneficial to post/talk to the others vice argueing to death what has happened with one person..?

 

[IceH2O]

Well RB why don't you start. I haven't really seen any cases built by you or any real ideas on who is what in your opinion.

Any input would be nice. I'm not real big on votes being thrown on 1 person even if they are my top suspect. I could put together a case on Jpap but then I'd be doing others work for them.

So step up to the plate and practice what you're preaching.

That is unless you're trying to seem helpful without really getting into the crowd.

Is it fun just milling around on the outskirts of town and watching? Can't get dirty if you don't get into the mix?

 

[Blueiz]

not defending pappy here... but i find missing a comma a lot easier than missing the whole entire scheme of a post and feel of a thread.... and pappy didnt go throwing out a vote right after he made a mistake either..

Not defending jo as I have some suspicions of him but jo said he thought DD's mistake was bigger than mine so he kept his vote on her. He never agreed with what I said. No one did. I didn't after Ice pointed out what happened.

As I said, my mistake, however, I still stand by the pushing for DD's lynch while not taking a step back to read what others were saying and think that he could indeed be mistaken.

Is it just a coincidence that you two state that you arent defending each other?

 

[jpappy789]

My mistake on you removing the comma Jo, however you DID agree with it without double checking.

Not defending jo as I have some suspicions of him but jo said he thought DD's mistake was bigger than mine so he kept his vote on her. He never agreed with what I said. No one did. I didn't after Ice pointed out what happened.

here blue. Ice pointed it out pretty much right after it happened and jo repsonded with this. He never agreed with what I had sad about DD.

As I said, my mistake, however, I still stand by the pushing for DD's lynch while not taking a step back to read what others were saying and think that he could indeed be mistaken.

Is it just a coincidence that you two state that you arent defending each other?

no blue, I am pretty sure you said "my mistake" to saying that jo missed the comma first. then you said he agreed with me about it before checking, which is completley incorrect. why didnt you check back since thats what you originally said jo should have done...???

and I am not so much as defending jo, because there is a lot on him anyways to try and do that, more so I am pointing out all of your inconsitancies since you started posting.

 

[Blueiz]

He was the only one that you apparently "fully agreed" with. These are back to back posts made less than 30 minutes apart. He's had my curiousity piqued a bit because he's not been actively looking for weasels and like I said to you earlier, I found the timing odd. What about that can't you understand? Would you not find it odd if I suddenly voted for someone with the same "I fully agree with you ____" post after others had made much better cases on the person (i.e. Plant's case for Jo)?

Hmm, becuase I dont post as you would, yet agree with what everyone else is saying, that makes some sort of point?

I wasnt here when others said the same thing. Charlies was the last post there, so I quoted him.

If youd like to focus on the timing, let the little wheels in your mind keep on turning.