It sure looks like you were saying it, Z. You say 'when PRESUMABLY two townies already lie dead.' The use of the word 'presumably' implies uncertainty, right? You presume it was two townies, but you're not sure. Then you go on to say that you still 'weren't sold on what happened to Ice and the mist', which would mean that Ice was the townie in question.
If Ice was maybe not a townie, but not a rebel, what else could he have been?
Folks can be brought back to life by the Mist and can PRESUMABLY have their roles reversed by the Mist. Plus we added in Mostly. Ice may not be dead dead yet, who knows. I asked if I was reading too much into it and you said yes, now I wonder if you aren't reading too much into what I said about the Mist.
I agree with you then on the principal but just not the certainty of the outcome. I kind of feel we need to lynch Kash after all this just to sort out things, but that isn't a good enough reason. You build a good case though. I certainly am expressing hesitation in running strongly at a Day 1 suspect when presumably two townies already lie dead (still not sold on what happened with Ice and the Mist). So if that makes me a suspect I will have to be a suspect.