Here Lab asks if FF is trying to sens signals to a communicating team (scum mainly).
Here FF says that she can't assume he's not already communicating. The investigation part sort of makes sense, but it's FF logic. If he's innocent then he should also hope that the CIs invest him so he can join...it makes even more sense since he claims to not do well when alone.
Here Lab questions the investigation part.
Now FF wants both teams to investigate him, which implies that he is not communicating. Contradicts the whole thing he told Lab about not assuming he's not already on a team, but I think FF was just trying to be confusing.
Asking to be investigated is always a red flag...trying to show off that you have nothing to hide is the opposite of what an innocent should do...you should prove through your posting that you are to be trusted.
Here DD asks FF is he is trying to imply innocence.
OK, I guess this makes sense in terms of FF logic. But again this claim of innocence is rather frightening.
You gave yourself away? Not really. You've been trying to get it out almost from the start that you're a noncomm. innocent.
Here Lab says its only more obvious that he's not on a team.
FF counters, again, saying she cannot assume he isn't already part of a team. I don't see any other way of interpreting this post...and of course, he's already implied that he is noncommunicating otherwise he wouldn't ask to be investigated.
Here Lab asks about the RC.
FF responds saying he is RCing...as a CI
Quickly retracts that, but still insisting that he is innocent. Odd, then, that he has twice questioned Lab for assuming he is not communicating when now he is RCing as a noncommunicating innocent.
Also, Labs post was a one sentence question so what part did you not read? I understand that this is FF, but honestly, her question was direct and didn't need much comprehension. It's hard to believe that FF mistook communicating for noncommunicating but that's not really the point.
Now the confusion starts...I don't buy it.